Asked
if he accepted that there had been a Holocaust
against the Jews, he responded that he was not
going to use their trade name. London, Friday, October 19, 2007
What
David Irving really thinks about the
Holocaust Hitler's
apologist By JC
Reporters TEN months after being freed
from an Austrian jail, where he served one-third of
a three-year sentence for
breaching
Austria's Holocaust-denial
laws, David Irving is
planning a "comeback tour". His
website invites browsers to hear him speak in
Birmingham (October 26), Coventry (November 14),
Liverpool (November 26) and Halifax. Those
responding are asked to supply an address and phone
number (obligatory). He has cooled on the idea of
sharing a platform with British National Party
leader Nick Griffin at an Oxford Union
debate. Yet despite protestations that his views on the
Holocaust have changed, few of his countless
critics are in any way convinced. Although he remains a prolific author, Irving's
reputation
as a wartime historian was demolished by
high-profile court cases in London and Vienna. In 2000, he sued American academic Professor
Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin
Books for libel in the High Court over being called
a Holocaust denier in Professor Lipstadt's
book, Denying The Holocaust. Following weeks of emotive testimony, Mr
Justice Gray found for the defendants,
describing Irving as a Holocaust denier and an
antisemite. In a mammoth
written judgment, he found it "substantially
true... that Irving has for his own ideological
reasons persistently and deliberately
misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence;
that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler
in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally
in relation to his attitude towards and
responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that
he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is
antisemitic and racist and that he associates with
rightwing extremists who promote
neo-Nazism". Irving was declared bankrupt in 2002 after
failing to pay one penny of the interim
£150,000 costs awarded against him. The
Austrian case in 2006 related to speeches delivered
in that country in 1989 which denied the existence
of gas chambers. He had been arrested on
returning in late 2005 to deliver further speeches,
in defiance of a ban. Irving pleaded guilty and his
lawyer appealed for clemency for an elderly man
with a young daughter who posed no threat to
Austria. But the judge cited the London libel trial
verdict and called Irving an antisemite. Asked by The
Guardian last month if he accepted that there
had been a Holocaust against the Jews, he responded
that he was "not going to use their trade name".
Moreover, his views on the Holocaust had
crystallised rather than changed. Jews were
responsible for what happened to them during the
war, and that nearly all the wars over the past
century could be attributed to the "Jewish
problem". He did acknowledge that the Nazis organised and
directed "a clandestine programme for the
liquidation of European Jews. "In my opinion, the real killing operations took
place at the Reinhardt camps west of the Bug river.
In the three camps there [Sobibor, Belzec and
Treblinka], Heinrich Himmler's men
killed possibly as many as 2.4 million in the two
years up to October 1943." Speaking to the JC on Wednesday, Irving
reiterated his assertion about the Eastern front,
but insisted that Auschwitz
was "not a major death camp". Nor was he moved from
his view that Hitler was not "involved in the mass
murder of Jews". Did he now accept the acknowledged figure of six
million deaths? "Mathematically, it may have been
in that order of magnitude. There were other
killings. But I am not into numbers. The figures
are not important. Every death was a tragedy,
whether it was three million or six million." Contacted
this week, Richard Rampton, QC, one of the
legal team for Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin,
pointed out that "one of the findings in the
Lipstadt hearing was that he [Irving] was a
Holocaust denier and that his motive was
antisemitism. There is no question that from 1988
onwards he was a persistent denier." He would
remain so "if he is still
denying the facts about Auschwitz". Another member of the defence team, Mishcon de
Reya partner James Libson, stressed that
"Holocaust denial can be to accept some but to deny
other aspects [of the Shoah]. Irving has a
history of trying to accept aspects in a bid to
rehabilitate himself." American history professor Christopher
Browning -- who provided evidence for the
defence -- believed that Irving's latest move was
an attempt "to bait people. I think he is being a
little more careful now. He's become quite
unpredictable other than he won't bad-mouth Hitler.
What the Lipstadt trial did achieve was stopping
Holocaust denial under the guise of academic
freedom." | "Ugly"
ADL
chief Abraham Foxman expressed dismay,
though not surprise, that David Irving,
below, "has once again reared his ugly
head." | |
In a statement from New York, Anti-Defamation
League director Abraham Foxman expressed
"dismay, though not surprise, that Irving has once
again reared his ugly head. His recklessness as a
historian, as well as his bigotry, is
well-documented, so it is highly unlikely that he
will ever again regain credibility among legitimate
scholars. Unfortunately, his new speaking tour will
continue to attract and inspire Holocaust deniers
and antisemites. "All he is doing now is playing with numbers,
which is a classic Holocaust denier ploy." Laurence Rees, producer of several BBC
documentaries on the Nazis and the Holocaust,
believed it best "to ignore him and deny him the
oxygen of publicity". A similar sentiment was expressed by Professor
Tony Kushner of Southampton University,
whose areas of expertise include Holocaust studies
and antisemitism. "All these student unions think
they are being very clever [for inviting
him] but they are playing into his hands. "He has always accepted
some element of what we would call the Holocaust,
but not the whole systematic scale of it,
and he is continuing on that path. It is always a
crude, sensational and wrong-headed version of the
past." At the Documentation Centre of Austrian
Resistance [Website
note: The Austrian body which engineereed the
arrest warrant for David Irving issued in November
1989], scientific director Dr
Brigitte Bailer was scornful of Irving's
claim that he was not a Holocaust denier. "He lies," she declared, alleging that after his
trial in Austria, "he again stated that he doubts
the veracity of the Holocaust. So I don't know how
he can maintain he is not a Holocaust denier." Dr Bailer voiced astonishment that Oxford
students had invited Irving to address them, giving
him "an honour which he does not deserve, an
importance he does not have. He is doing evil
political propaganda. He wants to be esteemed as an
historian, but he isn't." Hannah Lessing, director of Austria's
National Fund (for survivors), said that if it "was
not enough of a mistake that the Austrians let him
go free again, now Oxford is inviting him. Well, if
Columbia University can have [Iranian
President] Ahmadinejad... "We were shocked here that the second he
appealed against his sentence, he was acquitted. Is
it because he changed so much? Not at all. He is
exactly the same." Auschwitz survivor Trude Levi recalled
encountering Irving when she worked in London-based
Holocaust resource the Wiener Library in the early
1960s. "He was coming in to do research," she
recalled. "He was good-looking, very well spoken
and very polite, but for some reason we all had an
uncanny feeling about him. Then, when his book came
out about Dresden, we realised he was in love with
Hitler." Trial extracts taken from The Holocaust on
Trial by DD Guttenplan | [Click
for the actual Lipstadt trial
transcripts] -
Our
dossier on the Lipstadt Trial
-
-
David
Irving issues a warning letter: "I shall without
further notice issue a Claim in
Defamation"
-
Jewish
Chronicle editorial, "Irving and the
JC"
-
Why
Irving regretted his days in
court
-
A
Radical's Diary: The Jewish Chronicle is
becoming Irving-obsessed
-
Previously: Jewish
Chronicle expresses Outrage of Traditional
Enemies of Free Speech at David Irving's UK
tour:
pulling out all the stops to get the meetings
banned and
cancelled
| Its
leader-writer gets tangled in a twist: "Freedom
of speech is one of the principles our society
holds most dear. ...
That
is why we urge any public-hall booking clerk,
university administrator or private landlord to
refuse to give Irving a platform"
-
-
David
Irving's Books
The
Deborah Lipstadt Libel action-
-
Divided
loyalties -
Board
of Deputies of "British Jews" demanded of the
Austrian ambassador in 1992 that his country
imprison British historian David
Irving
-
David
Irving: A Radical's Diary: On
The Forward interview on the Holocaust, and the
interesting "Mel Gibson" theory that Jews have
been behind many of last century's
wars
| Jewish Telegraph Agency blurts out:
George
W Bush's Pro-'surge' group in Iraq is almost all
Jewish
- Coincidence, says one, "half of the donors
contributing to its $15 million ad campaign are
not Jewish" - and most of the GIs,
too
-
David
Irving: A Radical's Diary: Hysterical
efforts by the don't-debate-them, anti-free
speech gang meet some success
-
|