London, Tuesday, July 6, 2004
Himmler book
publisher was jailed for extremism By Ben
Fenton and Kate
Connolly THE German publisher of a book
which claims that British intelligence officers
murdered Heinrich Himmler is a Right-wing
extremist who has been jailed for publishing
revisionist history. David
Irving comments: ROLL that phrase around
your tongue, Americans, and savour it,:
Jailed in modern Germany "for publishing
revisionist history." Words committed to
paper without any comment, in all
seriousness, by this broadsheet journalist
and traditional enemy of free speech
Ben Fenton. Note that he has
failed to respond to requests for access
to the rest of the forensic tests on the
Himmler documents which he and his
newspaper commissioned -- he has published
only extracts so far. We do not doubt that his
quotations are accurate -- as accurate as
his reference to Traudl Junge as
Hitler's "surviving" secretary (she died
last year). Nor can even the Germans jail
somebody for "extremism"; Sudholt was
prosecuted under Germany's laws for the
suppression of free speech. Galileo was
extreme in his day, as was Copernicus. BUT what about this odd paragraph: "A
year later when the controversial British
historian David Irving lost a libel
action against an American professor who
had called him a Holocaust denier, Mr
Sudholt, 62, was described as one of the
author's leading contacts in the world of
German Right-wing extremism." What was the purpose of this paragraph,
for Heavens' sake, unless it originally
contained another sentence that the
newspaper's lawyers no doubt wisely struck
out. In fact Gerd
Sudholt is about as extreme as
Woody Allen. The hate- filled
German authorities eventually grabbed him,
outraged at his publication of books that
the mainline publishers had been warned to
suppress. He is a mild-mannered, educated,
and hard-working family man, but
unfortunately easily tricked and
misled. I refused to allow
publishers to sell my books to him (which
did not prevent Herbert Fleissner
of Langenmüller Verlag from
"selling
him rights" to my flagship work
"Hitler's
War" for 5000 euros some years back,
and telling him to keep it quiet from
me! Such is the state of
German law that when I got wind of the
planned Sudholt edition, my Munich lawyer
Heinz Lebrecht Herrmann failed to
act to obtain an injunction preventing it
("too late to stop it") and I was never
paid a penny by either publisher. Visiting London, Sudholt
later apologised to me that his publishing
firm Druffel had asked Dr Fleissner for a
proper contract, but Fleissner would only
give him a receipt for the cash
payment (because in fact Fleissner had
long lost the rights he was purporting to
own and sell, and they had reverted to
us). What a gang of crooks!
For a long time Sudholt would not speak
with me, because I warned him that the
Heinrich Müller
"interrogations" he was publishing were
forged by Gregory Douglas, aka the
American counterfeiter and forger
Peter
Stahl, aka etc., etc., etc.
Sudholt thought I was spoiling his scoop;
I was trying to save his skin. Seems there are more
sharks in the publishing world than in the
waters just south of here (Panama City,
Florida). | The claims, in Himmler's Secret War, by
Martin Allen, have been debunked by an independent
forensic analyst working on behalf of The Daily
Telegraph. The analysis showed that at least
four of the documents used to substantiate them
were forgeries smuggled into the National Archives
in Kew, west London. Almost all historians accept
that Himmler, the head of the SS, committed suicide
soon after being captured by British soldiers in
May 1945.Yesterday Gert Sudholt, the head of the
Druffel Verlag printing house in Munich, suggested
that the forgeries may have been perpetrated by
British agents. "We know that the Russians had a
massive system of forgeries - why not the
British?," he said. His publishing firm is renowned for its support
of former Nazis and "revisionist" historians. Mr Sudholt, whose stepfather, Helmut
Sündermann, was deputy to Otto
Dietrich, the Nazi press chief, has been
prosecuted at least three times for printing
far-Right material. He was jailed for six months in
1993 and received a suspended sentence in 1999 for
similar offences. A year later when the
controversial British historian David Irving
lost a libel action against an American professor
who had called him a Holocaust denier, Mr Sudholt,
62, was described as one of the author's leading
contacts in the world of German Right-wing
extremism. In addition to his publishing business, Mr
Sudholt also runs the Society for Free
Communication
[Gesellschaft für
freie Publizistik] which offers
former Nazi Party members and their families a
platform for their opinions. In the acknowledgments to Himmler's Secret
War, Mr Allen's third book, the author thanks
Mr Sudholt for his "great assistance in my search
for testimony from eyewitnesses of Germany's
past". These are thought to
include Gudrun Burwitz, Himmler's
daughter, and Traudl Junge, the last
surviving personal secretary to Adolf
Hitler. Mrs Burwitz is regarded by most
historians as an unrepentant Nazi. Mr Sudholt said
that despite the furore over the documents he would
still publish Mr Allen's book, even if the "three
relevant pages" were cut. He published Mr Allen's first book, Hidden
Agenda, under the title Dear Herr
Hitler, and his second, The Hitler/Hess
Deception, under the title Churchill's Peace
Trap. He said he had not spoken to Mr Allen about the
documents and was not prepared to say if they were
forgeries. "The most pressing questions for us now
are, if the documents were forged, where did they
come from, and who put them there and why were they
in the National Archive? Can we trust anything in
the National Archive at all for the last 500 years?
Can we indeed trust anything in any national
archive? This could lead to the review of
contemporary history and turn it on its head. "I am sure though that Mr Allen will not have
forged these - that's significant to us. We just
want to know how they ended up in the archives. Who
put them there? "If Mr Allen looked at them, someone must have
put them there. It's very exciting. You never know,
they might have been swapped for the real ones by
the British secret service - if that's the case the
story is even more spectacular." Mr Allen said last week that he had not realised
the Mr Sudholt had such extreme connections when
agreeing to let him publish his books in
Germany. He also claimed that Mr Sudholt guided him
towards Himmler as a subject. But Mr Sudholt said yesterday: "I gave him
contacts to people who knew Himmler and that was
helpful to him. But we didn't tell him to go to the
documents in the National Archive. I don't know of
them at all." Himmlers
Secret Sir
- I AM amazed that the manner of Himmler's death is
still being debated. My father (the late Dr C J
L Wells) was Medical Officer at the British
Army HQ in north Germany when Himmler was arrested
and brought in. He was asked to examine him, and when he was
about to look into his mouth, Himmler bit on the
concealed cyanide capsule and died immediately. My
father was annoyed that the authorities, who were
aware that this was a risk with high-profile Nazis,
did not warn him of the problem. These facts, I am sure, were well known at the
time. Dr A. L. Wells, Beccles, Suffolk -
Our
dossier on the suspect and genuine documents on
Himmler's death
-
-
Daily
Telegraph claims that forged documents were
planted in British
archives |
Daily
Telegraph Opinion: Faking our history |
The forensic
tests [650k pdf
] | Reader's
Letters to Daily Telegraph: Intelligence and
style clues point to fake Himmler
documents
-
Historian
calls for an inquiry over fake Himmler
documents
-
Reader's Letters to the Daily
Telegraph
-
The suspect 'Himmler
Liquidation' documents: Our
position at this point: David Irving
statement
-
Conformist
Churchill Historian Andrew Roberts calls for
inquiry and arrests -
with readers' letters
-
The Sunday Times accuses
Martin
Allen was involved in forgery row over his book
on Duke of Windsor too
-
Glasgow Herald:
Himmler
papers labelled forgeries
|