Judgment: Part II — The Words Complained Of and Their Meaning
Part II of the judgment — detailed analysis of the specific words complained of in Lipstadt's book 'Denying the Holocaust' and their meaning.
Read more →
Topic
Judgment
Decade:
2000s
15
Judgment: Part V — The Defendants’ Historiographical Criticisms of Irving
Part V of the judgment — a detailed assessment of the defendants' historiographical criticisms of Irving's methods and conclusions as a historian.
Read more →Judgment: Part VI — Evidence of the Attitude of Hitler Towards the Jews
Part VI of the judgment — examining the evidence regarding Hitler's attitude towards the Jews and Irving's treatment of this evidence.
Read more →Judgment: Part VII — Auschwitz
Part VII of the judgment — the court's analysis of the evidence concerning Auschwitz, gas chambers, and the scale of killing.
Read more →Judgment: Part VIII — The Claim that Irving is a Holocaust Denier
Part VIII of the judgment — assessing whether Irving qualifies as a Holocaust denier based on his public statements and publications.
Read more →Judgment: Part IX — The Allegation that Irving is an Anti-Semite and a Racist
Part IX of the judgment — examining the allegation that Irving is an anti-semite and a racist, based on his speeches and writings.
Read more →Judgment: Part X — The Claim that Irving Associates with Right Wing Extremists
Part X of the judgment — considering the claim that Irving associates with right-wing extremists and the evidence presented.
Read more →Judgment: Part XI — The Bombing of Dresden
Part XI of the judgment — a forensic examination of Irving's claims about the bombing of Dresden and the casualty figures.
Read more →Judgment: Part XII — Irving’s Conduct in Relation to the Goebbels Diaries
Part XII of the judgment — Irving's conduct in relation to the Goebbels diaries, including allegations of theft and manuscript damage.
Read more →Judgment: Part XIII — Findings on Justification
Part XIII of the judgment — the court's findings on the defence of justification, summarizing conclusions on each major allegation.
Read more →Judgment: Part I — Introduction
Part I of the judgment — the court's introduction to the case, summarizing the main issues and the nature of the dispute between the parties.
Read more →Judgment: Part III — The Nature of Irving’s Claim for Damages
Part III of the judgment — the court's analysis of Irving's claim for damages and the legal framework for defamation.
Read more →Judgment: Part IV — The Defence of Justification: An Overview
Part IV of the judgment — an overview of the defence of justification, examining how the defendants sought to prove the truth of their statements.
Read more →Judgment: Introduction and Table of Contents
The introduction and table of contents of Mr Justice Gray's landmark judgment in David Irving v Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah Lipstadt.
Read more →