Posted
Thursday,

Index
to the Traditional Enemies of Free
Speech
Alphabetical index (text)

David
Hebden
is puzzled about the figures contained in a recently discovered British decode about the Operation Reinhard camps, Thursday, October 9,
2003

More problems with the Höfle decode

JUST when we thought we had solved the decode problem to our satisfaction, another problem crops up.

The
Korherr Report (see links below) lists evacuations from Bialystok separately from those of the General
Government [of Poland].
Accordingly, the 1,274,166 evacuees (and the respective breakdowns into camp totals) recorded in the Höfle telegram shouldn’t include those from the Bialystok district.

Which would suggest the attempt by Stephen Tyas
and Peter Witte to the trace the deportees to
Treblinka, for the last two weeks in December
[1942], to Bialystok district is misconceived.

David
Hebden

The Korherr Report: English
translation | German,
long text | German,
short text
Richard
Korherr wrote letter to Der Spiegel in July 1977
protesting

against false interpretation of word
Sonderbehandlung

More problems with the
Höfle decode: The Korherr Report

Other letters by David Hebden on this website:

The source of Rudolf
Höss’s figures | and
another
What Stalin
told his generals of plans to attack Germany

Free download of David Irving’s books Bookmark the download page to find the latest new free books

David
Irving comments

I WISH I could have interviewed Dr
Richard
Korherr, Himmler’s inspector of statistics. His letter to der Spiegel (on my website) suggests he was unaware of any lethal interpretations. That would make him very gullible.

Adolf Eichmann referred to his report obliquely in the original Eichmann papers I brought back from
Argentina., though without naming him. I think the origin of the report was a request circulated by the Reichskanzlei at the end of 1942 to all Reich ministers for a statistical overview of the activities of their ministries in the first ten years of power, since January 1933, for Adolf
Hitler to use in a speech on January 30, 1943.

There are traces of such requests and the internal ministerial paperwork involved in compiling such figures in the Erhard Milch files of the
Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM) and the Albert Speer
ministry, and no doubt elsewhere. In other words, the report was not just a grisly whim of Heinrich Himmler, a desire for an interim body count, but part of a larger statistical effort.

The Höfle telegram which the British appear to have intercepted would then be part of the underlying research for the report to Hitler.

The droll feature was, as I first pointed out in my 1977 Hitler’s
War, that the draft Korherr report was couched in language rather too transparent for
Himmler’s liking, and he ordered the phrase “der
Sonderbehandlung zugeführt” (turned over to special treatment) to be softened to “channeled through to the East” for the Führer’s benefit. That was surely an edit that deserved some honest and conscientious analysis: was it with, or without, Hitler’s knowledge and compliance?

Because that would answer the basic question which has caused historians such heartache since my book appeared: How much did Hitler himself know?