⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
Snsenica
of USA, writes
Amen to that
I’N NO lawyer, but before reading the incoherent ramblings of the Court of Appeals in thjis case, I had a lot of respect for the British penchant for reason in discourse. It seems rather simple to me. What the hell is a “Holocaust Denier”? The term must have some definite meaning since it is the basis of a goldmine for the accuser. Did the court spend any time defining the term? Not from what I could see.
I have to admit that I don’t have a week to read carefully the longwinded wandering discussions. Anyway, if ever visit England I will be very cafefull to obey the laws lest I be brought before a rambling judge.