Historical Documents

Day 19: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Day 20: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Part II: Professor Richard Evans’ Cross-Examination by David Irving continued, Morning Session (2.1-114.3)

Day 21: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Part II: Irving Cross-Examines Professor Richard John Evans (2.1-114.17)

Day 22: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Part II: Professor Richard Evans’ Cross-Examination by David Irving continued, Morning Session (2.1-108.24)

Day 23: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

B E T W E E N: DAVID JOHN CAWDELL IRVING Claimant -and- (1) PENGUIN BOOKS LIMITED (2) DEBORAH E. LIPSTADT Defendants The Claimant appeared in person MR RICHARD RAMPTON…

Day 24: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Day 24 of the Irving v Lipstadt trial at the Royal Courts of Justice, London. Complete transcript of proceedings before Mr Justice Gray.

Day 25: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Day 26: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

(10.00 a.m.) < Dr Longerich, Recalled. < Cross-Examined by Mr Irving. MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Yes. MR IRVING:  Before we start, there is one thing I would like to do. Dr Longerich has…

Day 27: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

(10.30 a.m.) MR RAMPTON:  I think Mr Irving has something to say, my Lord. MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Yes, Mr Irving?

Day 28: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

(10.30 a.m.) < Professor Funke, recalled. < Cross-Examined by Mr Irving, continued. MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Yes, Mr Irving? MR IRVING:  My Lord, I have put two small bundles in front of your…

Day 29: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

(10.30 a.m.) MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Mr Rampton and Mr Irving, before we start today, I wonder if I can hand to you now a list of issues? MR IRVING:  Yes.

Day 30: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Day 31: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

< (10.30 a.m.) MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Mr Irving? MR IRVING:  My Lord, I have provided your Lordship a copy of the fresh off the presses closing speech which I would propose to…

Day 32: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript

Judgment: Part II — The Words Complained Of and Their Meaning

Part II of the judgment — detailed analysis of the specific words complained of in Lipstadt's book 'Denying the Holocaust' and their meaning.

Judgment: Part V — The Defendants’ Historiographical Criticisms of Irving

Part V of the judgment — a detailed assessment of the defendants' historiographical criticisms of Irving's methods and conclusions as a historian.

Judgment: Part VI — Evidence of the Attitude of Hitler Towards the Jews

Part VI of the judgment — examining the evidence regarding Hitler's attitude towards the Jews and Irving's treatment of this evidence.

Judgment: Part VII — Auschwitz

Part VII of the judgment — the court's analysis of the evidence concerning Auschwitz, gas chambers, and the scale of killing.

Judgment: Part VIII — The Claim that Irving is a Holocaust Denier

Part VIII of the judgment — assessing whether Irving qualifies as a Holocaust denier based on his public statements and publications.

Judgment: Part IX — The Allegation that Irving is an Anti-Semite and a Racist

Part IX of the judgment — examining the allegation that Irving is an anti-semite and a racist, based on his speeches and writings.