⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
Last
February the international
court of justice ruled that
past and present government
leaders could not be tried for
war crimes by a foreign
state. . .
Friday January 17, 2003
[Lord Nelson sees nothing]
Belgium may revive Sharon war crimes case
Andrew Osborn in
Brussels
BELGIUM is to make changes to its internationally contentious global war crimes legislation which risk resurrecting a politically sensitive case against the Israeli prime minister,
Ariel Sharon.
Belgium gave itself the right in 1993
to try cases of war crimes committed by anyone, anywhere at any time. It has since had to deal with a series of often embarrassing lawsuits against high-profile leaders such as Mr Sharon.
However, legal setbacks to the
“universal competence” law have blunted
Belgium’s zeal to act as an international war crimes court.
Last June a Belgian court appeared to kill off the case against Mr Sharon when it declared that he could not be tried because he wasn’t physically present in
Belgium.
That obstacle now appears likely to be dismantled.
Belgian politicians want foreign nationals to be be tried in absentia and will vote on the matter next week. They aim to change the law before parliamentary elections in May.
“The Sharon case is one of many,” said
Philippe Mahoux, a Socialist senator involved with the initiative, adding that 26 cases remained outstanding, including those against Fidel
Castro and Yasser Arafat.
“We want to sweep away impunity when it comes to genocide and war crimes. That’s the idea and we have the firm intention of approving the changes [to the law]
before May,” he said yesterday.
Guy
Verhoftstadt, the Belgian prime
minister, has thrown his weight behind
the plan, saying he has “no
objections”, and the Belgian media say
that the calls for reform of the
controversial law are reaching critical
mass.
The move is likely to give a new lease of life to the case against Mr Sharon, who is accused of being responsible for the massacre of more than 800 Palestinians in
Lebanon in 1982 while he was Israel’s minister of defence, because, it is claimed, he allowed militia forces allied to Israel to run amok in the Sabra and
Shatila refugee camps.
Survivors of the atrocities began legal proceedings against him in Belgium and were furious when the case was dismissed by three judges in Brussels in June.
The Sharon case is still under appeal and remains live, so any change in the law could see it reinstated.
The very fact that Belgian judges are even considering a case against Mr Sharon has soured relations with Israel and many
Belgian politicians were relieved when the matter appeared to be at an end. They will not welcome new proceedings.
However,
Mr Sharon’s accusers face another, probably insurmountable hurdle, which is likely to mean that even a trial in absentia will never get off the ground.
Last February the international court of justice ruled that past and present government leaders could not be tried for war crimes by a foreign state, a ruling that is likely to spare Israel’s blushes.
The Belgians are keen to steer clear of cases which damage their diplomatic ties with other countries.
Although the latest changes will allow trials in absentia and authorise the
Belgian courts to try cases which fall outside the jurisdiction of the recently created international criminal court, there will be a special clause designed to deter “legal tourists”.
A filtering mechanism will be created to weed out cases which are purely political or propagandist in nature.
“We will put up a filter for those cases which are not linked to Belgium… to allow for a speedier dismissal of purely political complaints which don’t have anything to do with genocide or war crimes and which are often lodged as propaganda,” said Vincent Van
Quickenborne, a Liberal senator.
A public prosecutor will vet such cases first and decide whether or not they are genuine, although dismissals at such an early stage could be appealed.
Related items on this website:
Our
dossier on the origins of
anti-Semitism
Ariel
Sharon to be tried for Crimes Against
Humanity | Sharon
summonsed to face war crimes in
Belgium |
BBC
news item on this]
Belgian
court delays
hearing on jurisdiction to
investigate Israeli leader for war
crimes
[What
Ariel Sharon Said]