Trial transcripts, expert reports, and legal documents from the Irving v Lipstadt case. Complete documentation of the 2000 libel trial proceedings.
512 results from the 1970s
PART FIVE CONCERNING IRVING X Auschwitz and David Irving (1977 – 1988-1992) He wears his faith but as the fashion of his hat. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing. He wears…
Read more →In the case of David John Cawdell Irving, plaintiff, and Penguin Books Limited and Deborah E. Lipstadt, defendants, there are a number of points of contention that touched my own…
Read more →1.I am employed by Canadian Jewish Congress (“CJC”), Ontario Region, as the Executive Director.
Read more →Witness statement of Israel Gutman, submitted as evidence in the Irving v Lipstadt trial — testimony on Holocaust history and historiography.
Read more →Deborah Lipstadt's own witness statement submitted in the trial, detailing her background, research methods, and the basis for her claims about David Irving.
Read more →Witness statement of Steven M. Wasserstrom, submitted as evidence in the Irving v Lipstadt trial.
Read more →Part II of the judgment — detailed analysis of the specific words complained of in Lipstadt's book 'Denying the Holocaust' and their meaning.
Read more →Part V of the judgment — a detailed assessment of the defendants' historiographical criticisms of Irving's methods and conclusions as a historian.
Read more →Part VI of the judgment — examining the evidence regarding Hitler's attitude towards the Jews and Irving's treatment of this evidence.
Read more →Part VII of the judgment — the court's analysis of the evidence concerning Auschwitz, gas chambers, and the scale of killing.
Read more →Part VIII of the judgment — assessing whether Irving qualifies as a Holocaust denier based on his public statements and publications.
Read more →Part IX of the judgment — examining the allegation that Irving is an anti-semite and a racist, based on his speeches and writings.
Read more →Part X of the judgment — considering the claim that Irving associates with right-wing extremists and the evidence presented.
Read more →Part XI of the judgment — a forensic examination of Irving's claims about the bombing of Dresden and the casualty figures.
Read more →Part XII of the judgment — Irving's conduct in relation to the Goebbels diaries, including allegations of theft and manuscript damage.
Read more →Part XIII of the judgment — the court's findings on the defence of justification, summarizing conclusions on each major allegation.
Read more →(b) Evidence at Hitler's trial in 1924 1. The first link in Irving's self-proclaimed chain of key documents which demonstrate that Hitler was the best friend the Jews ever had in…
Read more →(c) 'Reichskristallnacht' November 1938. 1. The second link in Irving's 'chain' of proof that Hitler defended the Jews is Hitler's actions during the events of 9-10 November 1938, part-trivialized,
Read more →(d) The expulsion of Jews from Berlin, 1941 1. With the German invasion of Poland and the beginning of the Second World War on 1 September 1939, Nazi policy against the…
Read more →(e) The Schlegelberger note 1. Irving consistently argues that far from driving on Nazi Germany's antisemitic policies, Hitler frequently personally intervened to stop them or water them down. One k
Read more →