lie Browning
SHATTERED by his ordeal in cross examination at the hands of Zündel's counsel Douglas Christie , Browning refused to testify again in the later Zündel trials, not wanting to go through that -- ever...
Read the recordTopic
A comprehensive archive of primary source documents, testimony, and correspondence relating to the Holocaust. Includes trial evidence, survivor accounts, and historical analysis from David Irving research.
SHATTERED by his ordeal in cross examination at the hands of Zündel's counsel Douglas Christie , Browning refused to testify again in the later Zündel trials, not wanting to go through that -- ever...
Read the recordTHIS "NEUTRAL" expert witness and specialist about the extreme right, Dr Hajo Funke, while being a personable and engaging expert with whom Mr Irving enjoyed discussions during the court pauses, was...
Read the recordTHE READER is left with the impression that Lipstadt is unfamiliar with the Dr Goebbels biography. In fact from late 1995 she and her Jewish pals masterminded the eventually successful campaign to...
Read the recordIN FACT documents disclosed by Lipstadt under English trial procedures indicated that in her original book draft she had not even mentioned Mr Irving -- so much for his being the most "dangerous" on...
Read the recordTHIS "NEUTRAL" expert witness and specialist on Hitler, Dr Peter Longerich, had an embarrassing moment with Mr Irving two years earlier. Lecturing at the German Institute in London on the evolution...
Read the recordThere was no possibility of Lipstadt countersuing, presumably in defamation. Mr Irving had never libelled her.
Read the recordNOTE OF course the underlying implication of all this: Deborah Lipstadt did not have the evidence she needed at the time she wrote her lies, despite having canvassed all her pals, the ADL , the Board...
Read the recordNOW did she read the secret Irving diaries or didn't she? (Silly question, because we know from other sources that she did). But see below in this same essay where she writes: "I was sitting with...
Read the recordMr IRVING has kept a daily diary for forty years or more. The diaries fill around 50,000,000 words. The Defense asked him to produce all entries relating to their wish-list of names. It would have...
Read the recordTHAT is because there was none. Mr Irving occasionally received letters from such people, but rarely filed them. The defense were living in a dream world, in which a wish-list becomes reality even...
Read the recordTHIS was not the impression that Mr Irving had, as he easily found important gaps in her Discovery, and on occasion had to go before Master Trench in interlocutary proceedings on his own summons and...
Read the recordUPON READING the properly qualified forensic reports appended to the Leuchter Report , in 1988, which showed no significant trace of cyanide residue in buildings formerly identified as the homicidal...
Read the recordAT NO point in his 333 page Judgment did the judge Sir Charles Gray call Mr Irving a liar. He did say, "Mr Irving's knowledge of World War II history is unparallelled," but Prof Lipstadt appears to...
Read the recordTHIS decision was made at a hearing on Directions. Mr Irving and Mr Julius had discussed the matter outside the Court, and Mr Irving had diffidently volunteered to Mr Julius, on the advice of his own...
Read the recordNOT so, as Prof Lipstadt may yet find to her cost. The discovered item has to be "mentioned" in Court, before the implied undertaking is considered waived. There are also important considerations of...
Read the recordTHIS IS a common error of libellers. Because they are quoting from a printed source -- a newspaper, even the National Review -- they think they are safe from lawsuits. They are not. A duty bears upon...
Read the recordTHE DEFENCE subsequently offered a plethora of reasons why they did not call Auschwitz survivors as witnesses. The obvious one might seem to be that they were fearful that their survivors would crack...
Read the recordLIPSTADT misses the point. A historian's "stock in trade" is the secret material that he has acquired in a lifetime of research and hard field work. From the applications made by Lipstadt and her...
Read the recordMr Irving writes: YES, A BLOOMSBURY bistro. I can never forget that on the evening after burying my oldest daughter one sad day three months before the trial began, I received an unexpected anonymous...
Read the recordTHIS whinge is a common, indeed comical, strain throughout all Lipstadt's articles about the trial: shock, horror, bafflement, and amazement that she is expected to prove that what she wrote is true....
Read the recordDavid Irving replies about the Holocaust Website DAVID IRVING comments on the Emory University Holocaust on Trial Website My views about Emory remain unchanged. IF A university can tolerate the...
Read the recordSomebody is telling porkies Clicking on the little Pinocchio icon will inform you what the untruth is, in our view
Read the recordAnnotations by Deborah Lipstadt to her essay DEBORAH E. LIPSTADT, DENYING THE HOLOCAUST: THE GROWING ASSAULT ON TRUST AND MEMORY (1993). For additional information regarding this trial, see Holocaust...
Read the recordThe "implied undertaking" and Discovery (Disclosure) of documents in UK Law: In Halsbury's Laws of England , 4 Edition, paragraph 66, dealing with the use of documents disclosed on discovery, it is...
Read the record