National
Vanguard Friday, April 9, 2004 Top Ranked 'Jew
Watch' Site Under Attack by Kevin Alfred Strom NATIONAL Alliance member and
retired librarian Frank Weltner has operated
'Jew
Watch' -- jewwatch.com
-- since 1995 as a watchdog site and Internet
resource for readers and scholars interested in
researching Jewish issues. Through hard work and
consistency, the site has managed to achieve a high
ranking on the number one search engine, Google. In
fact, merely entering the word 'Jew' into the
Google search box returns Jew Watch pages as the
top two entries. David
Irving comments: I AM posting this
story, which was emailed to me by a reader
today, not because of its Jewish angle but
because of its Google and censorship
angle, which we have followed on more than
one occasion on this website. After pausing for a
moment to puzzle, briefly, on why a Jew
would type the word "Jew" into a
searach-engine, let me say this: Google is
one of the world's premier search-engines,
and we are all dismayed to see it coming
under any kind of outside influence which
may skew its results and degrade its
usefulness. Of course at Focal Point
we have our own concerns about this, as we
are also a target of these bigots: our
website currently outranks that of the
odious Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai Brith (annual income:
$60m), for example. "They" do not like
that, and are doing all they can to
reverse the trend. [I have added a lot of links at the
foot of this page,
which were not in the original
article.] Help
our website grow. Use your credit card,
just once | Google's ranking algorithm, the method used to
determine the most useful and therefore the
highest-ranked sites, is not public -- the company
fears that should its exact parameters become
known, advertisers would exploit them to gain
falsely inflated rankings for their worthless sites
-- but it is believed to analyze the site's text
for content relevant to the site's ostensible
subject, click-throughs from Google itself, and
links from other sites with relevant content on the
same subject. By all those criteria, Jew Watch is
the number one site in its specialized field.Since Jew Watch
archives material from many sources -- Jewish
and non-Jewish -- which express a critical
attitude toward the power-seeking and
power-exercising activities of the Jewish
establishment, the site's top ranking at Google
has angered Jewish groups, some of which have
attempted to pressure the search giant to alter
its automated ranking criteria to prevent
'anti-Semitic' sites like Jew Watch from
receiving a high search page position. This is
something that Google has so far refused to do.
Other Jews are spearheading a plan to spoof the
Google algorithm by providing numerous links from
their sites to the Wikipedia online encyclopedia
entry for the word 'Jew' and then submitting the
url of their newly-linked pages to Google, in an
effort to move the Wikipedia page's Google position
higher than the Jew Watch position. As of this writing, the Wikipedia page is still
number three, after two pages from Jew Watch. It's
not really clear just what these Jewish spoofers
would 'win' even if they were successful in
hijacking the top spot: Jew Watch would still be
number two, just as visible -- and, with all the
controversy they've created over it, with a lot
more traffic. The Jewish efforts at pressuring and 'link
bombing' Google (the latter is something which
Google disapproves of, by the way) have generated
quite a bit of press, with stories on ZDNet, the
Los Angeles Times, the Jerusalem
Post, the Charleston (South Carolina) Post
and Courier, and many others.
The Post and Courier reports: A FEW hours before Passover,
Jerri Chaplin of Charleston was shocked to
learn that people looking on the Internet for
information about Jews are likely to end up at a
Web site denying the Holocaust and portraying Jews
as a threat to the American way of life.
Google is the world's most popular Internet
search engine. Type in the word "Jew," hit Web
search, and the resultant list is topped by a site
called Jew Watch. Jew Watch promotes the belief
that Jews control American newspapers, the movie
industry, the banking system and the military for
their own interests.... Site operator Frank Weltner, a retired
librarian who lives in St. Louis, defended the site
Monday in a telephone interview. "They (Jews) own the media; they own the banks,"
Weltner said. "This is a democracy, and in a
democracy, minorities should not rule. But Jews
don't feel that way; they feel that they should
rule this country, and I object to that. I want my
country back." That's a sample of the tone of the site, and
it's causing Jews to wonder why Google features it
so prominently. Chaplin heard about it from an
e-mail that's apparently circulating around the
world. The controversy was featured a couple of
days ago in The Jerusalem Post. Google's operators have said they are in no way
against Jews but can't remove Jew Watch from its
search engine. "The way that Google decides to rank and order
Web pages is done completely automatically, using
(computer) software," corporate spokesman David
Krane said Monday. "This ranking criterion is
essentially representative of popular opinion on
the Internet." Even when people don't like the results, Google
operators never interfere with the computer
program, said Krane, who identified himself as a
Jew who will be observing Passover. "That's the
promise that Google has made to its users for more
than six years," Krane said. "We guarantee an
objective, tamper-free search experience." The search program analyzes 4 billion Web pages
and sorts more than 100 factors to decide how to
rank them, Krane said. A big factor is how many
high-volume Web pages have links to the site. ...Jew Watch was still No. 1 on Google when Jew
was the search word Monday evening. It came up No.
18 on Yahoo, the second most popular search engine.
[It's the eighth result shown at Altavista. --
Ed.] A number of Jews are trying another strategy to
knock Jew Watch from the top of the list. They're
putting links to the online dictionary Wikipedia's
reference to "Jew" on their Web sites and
encouraging people to click away....
The Jerusalem Post piece describes one Jew's
"call to arms" over Jew Watch and openly admits
Jewish efforts to remove the site: What is a Jew? Those hoping to find out from a
Google search are in for an unpleasant surprise.
The first of 1.75 million entries that appear when
you type "Jew" into the search engine is an
anti-Semitic site. This discovery by a New York real-estate
developer, among others, has sparked a cyberspace
showdown, and a bid to alter the situation by a
small band of Internet experts. While surfing the Web from his New York home,
real-estate investor Steven Weinstock was
shocked to find Jew Watch, filled with propaganda
similar to that used by the Nazis. "At first I felt surprised, and then those
feelings turned to shock," he said. What upset him most is not that hatemongers
might be publishing such lies, but that any person
looking to find out about Judaism would be offered
choices such as the "Jewish Controlled Press,"
"Jewish World Conspiracies," "Jewish Media Lies,"
and "Jewish Banking and Financial Manipulations."
Under one of the categories, titled "Revisionists
-- 6,000,000 Jews DID NOT DIE," there are dozens of
links to articles dedicated to Holocaust
revisionism. Weinstock has been working
to get rid of the site. Last Saturday, he
launched his own Web site, called Remove Jew Watch,
containing a petition which received more than
3,000 signatures in its first 48 hours -- 1,500 on
Monday alone. He also wrote an e-mail to Google,
demanding that it remove the site. In an e-mail response, Google refused:
"Unfortunately, no computer can assess the
morality, tastefulness, or honesty of a site's
content. Results are determined by computer
algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate
a page's relevance to a given query." Emboldened by Google's refusal, Daniel
Sieradski, editor of the Jew School, a site
devoted to Jewish fringe culture, decided to take
matters into his own hands. Using a method called
Google bombing, which exploits a quirk in Google's
algorithms, he hoped to raise another site to the
No. 1 rank. "I decided to issue a call to arms on my Web
site," Sieradski said. "Within a week, my proposal
caught the attention of other Jewish bloggers
[keepers of Web-based diaries] in the US,
Canada, and Israel." Sieradski's efforts paid off. The Wikipedia
encyclopedia listing for "Jew," which just a week
ago held no rank on Google, rose to the
fourth-highest entry. But Sieradski is still not
satisfied. "Our work is not yet done," he said. "We've got
quite a way to go before we reach No. 1, and then
start to push Jew Watch completely off the first
page." ...Jew Watch's description of itself is bland:
"Archive of essays, articles, and on-line books
about a perceived international Jewish conspiracy:
Keeping a Close Watch on Jewish Communities &
Organizations Worldwide." ...Perversely, the site
also has links to Jewish community and civil rights
organizations such as B'nai
B'rith, the American Civil Liberties Union, and
the Simon
Wiesenthal Center, but lists them as "Jewish
Hate Groups." "If
it means hating extremists, racists, and
anti-Semites, then this title is well deserved,"
said Dr. Efraim Zuroff, director of the
Simon Wiesenthal Center in Jerusalem (right,
with Chilean ambassador to Israel). "Not to
fight against these groups increases their
potential to poison the minds of millions." There is an inherent danger when a hate site
masquerades as an academic
resource, said Brian Marcus of the
civil-rights division of the Anti-Defamation
League. "One of our major concerns is that children
unable to discern what is true will stumble onto
these hate sites," he said. "There have been many
cases where children unknowingly turn in school
reports that contain anti-Semitic and racist
remarks." Stopping hate sites has been difficult, said
Zuroff. "What is going on is really outrageous;
they can get away with saying the worst things:
lies, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, and racist
remarks. And yet all of our efforts to date to
get these sites off the Web have been
unsuccessful because the First Amendment enables
people to make racist and anti-Semitic
remarks."...
WHAT'S really interesting about
the Jerusalem Post story is the admission by
Zuroff that the Jewish goal is censorship of their
critics, and the assumption that Jewish groups can
decide what is and what is not an "academic
resource" based on its position regarding Jews.
Also quite revealing is the notice taken of the
controversy in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
Angeles, a paper read mainly by Jews. David
Krane -- the Jewish spokesman for Google on this
issue -- comes across in most of these articles as
a staunch opponent of censorship or alteration of
the ranking algorithm to give tainted search
results. But when speaking to the Jewish paper, he
sang a somewhat different tune: ... The No. 1 ranking of Jew Watch came
as a surprise to David Krane, the director of
corporate communications for the San Mateo-based
Web giant.Such a page might not pop up for Google
searchers in European countries, where Holocaust
denial is illegal. But Krane adamantly stated
that Google has no plans to manually alter the
results of their ranking system to knock Jew
Watch from its top spot. "No, we don't do that. Google merely reflects
what is on the Web and does its best to
algorithmically rank pages. Unless [a Web
page] violates a country or local law, we
don't make any tweaks," he said. So how did a hate site grab Google's top
spot? Krane explained that Google's search
engine discerns a site's "relevance" by the
number of pages with a forwarding link to it in
addition to the prominence of those sites. While Google will not alter the results of
its search engine, Krane promised to alert the
firm's engineers to further refine the search
algorithm, which might alter the findings for
the term "Jew." He invited users concerned about search
results to contact [email protected]. User
feedback is fed directly to engineers, he
said. Jew Watch is valuable on several levels, but the
most important is this: Jewish groups, working with
corrupt politicians, have already made publishing
certain opinions on history and politics illegal in
many nations. Groups that would take away our
freedom of speech should be watched, and watched
very closely indeed. -
Charleston
Post and Courier article
-
Jewish
Journal of Greater Los Angeles story
-
CNET
News article
-
Controversy over Google
search-engine grows: Harvard
experts on Web censorship detect that Google
engine, bowing to German and French pressure,
suppresses sites (including
ours)
| Who
hijacked it? | Who
writes the offensive "category" notes? | See
too Google
Watch | Jamie
McCarthy's role | Who
hijacked ...
(continued) |
"C"
discovers another odd thing about it |
The
Memory Hole: Google engine has sanitised the
David Shayler website
[more on Google's
Web-fixing] | More
on The Google Gods
| Google.de
schließt illegale Seiten aus
-
So
much for First Amendment: As the traditional
enemies slowly throttle free speech, report
shows Internet filtering now in 43% of US public
libraries
(thank God for the home
computer).
-
Websites
become dependent on Google search
engine
-
White
House Alters Website To Block Google
Archives
-
The
two brains behind Google
-
Lynda
Mortl has been investigating library censorship
of websites
-
Robert
Fisk identifies US missile that killed 62 Arabs,
by using Google
-
Censorship
of revisionism - at €1,100,000 (over
$1million) the largest budget item in Euro
Internet
-
Europe
to criminalize Internet "hate speech" including
hyperlinks to offensive pages
-
Google.de
schließt illegale Seiten aus
-
Canadian
Jewish newspapers warned that revisionists have
seized the Internet high ground, called for more
police censorship
-
|