⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
about Auschwitz your Heinrich Himmler Index your Adolf Eichmann Index your your Rudolf Hoess Index your Hans Aumeier Index your Robert Jan Van Pelt Index Jeremy Crawford draws obvious conclusions from the failures of the “eye witnesses” in the Tube shoot-to-kill case, How good are eye-witnesses? I NOTE with interest the deconstruction of ‘eye witnesses’ in the Jean Charles de Menezes saga .
In particular: “Witnesses’ recollection of every aspect of an incident can be contaminated by what they hear from other people” and “Memories are very vulnerable to error.
If you witness a crime and then read a local news report everything can be combined in your memory at a later date” Why is it that we are quite happy to question independent eye witnesses (who have no interest in lying), and demand a full inquiry into the death of just one man, while on the other hand, we blindly accept the murder of six million Jews by mostly by gas on the basis of some ASSHOL ‘s testimony. J.Edmund Crawford
See Also
- Why They Did Not Call Auschwitz Survivors as Witnesses (Document)
- Holocaust Denial (Article)
- It appeared in Holocaust and Genocide studies (Document)
- The Holocaust (Document)
- Real History and Propaganda Stories about Auschwitz (Document)