New
Zealanders exposed Prof. Evans’s vicious bias on same date as Lord Justice Sedley relied on him
Mr. Justice Gray, having declared himself a judge and not a historian, proceeded to accept the historical evidence of Prof.
Evans and the cultural historian Prof.
Van der Pelt, et al, and used their “expert evidence” upon which to base his partial and extremely prejudiced judgment against you. Both Ms. Lipstadt and Penguin Books went on record, as saying the Gray judgement was more than they could have hoped for.
Thousands of other academics felt the same – except for different reasons.
[In New Zealand] independent-minded qualified expert historians and a Judge were asked to judge the Joel Hayward case – should his MA degree be annulled because it dealt with the historical theme of revisionism — anti-revisionist scholars had demanded that Hayward’s MA be revoked because of its academic subject matter. The investigating body concluded that it could not be taken off him[1].