⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
Historical Documentation Notice

This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.

The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.

Letters to David
Irving on this Website


Unless correspondents ask us not to, this Website will post selected letters that it receives and invite open debate.

Dr
J
M Andrade
writes from Portugal, October 13, 1998:


I
HAVE JUST come across your Internet site and feel I must congratulate you on a most stimulating undertaking. As a professional historian, I have made a point of reading all your books, ever since I bought The
Destruction of Dresden many years ago. I wrote you back in the early 1980s, about the “Gleiwitz incident,” to which you were kind enough to reply.

Having spent a few years working in intelligence assessment, in my country of origin, I was particularly interested in the
Polizei intercepts shown in your site. My question is, how reliable are they?
Were the actual intercepts ‘edited’ before they were submitted to Winston Churchill?

The reliability of one’s sources, as you yourself have shown time after time, is vital. Years ago, I was contacted by a
US television network and asked to give an expert opinion on
Hugh Thomas’ Rudolf Hess book. The author’s theory was that, on that fateful day, Hess took off on a peace mission but was forced to land on his way to Scotland and replaced by a lookalike flying a broadly similar Bf 110.

He based his theory on a number of photos, said to have been taken before and during take-off, which clearly showed Hess boarding a Bf
110 with different camouflage and markings from the aircraft which crash-landed in Scotland. I wrote a report, identifying the aircraft by model and variant, Werk-Nummer, call sign and camouflage scheme, and concluded that I had no doubt that the aircraft shown in the photos and the one which ended up in Scotland were not the same.

Then I added that, in my humble opinion, the author’s theory was mainly based on a rather flimsy detail: was he sure that the photos were indeed taken on that day, and how could he prove it? I must have annoyed somebody, because I never received so much as a thank-you note.

J
M Andrade
Portugal

David Irving notes:

YES,
THAT takes me back a few years. Those Polizeberichte are all genuine. Churchill was shown not only regular digests, but always demanded to see the raw originals too, he must have had an amazing reading load each day. The expert to contact on them in the UK is Dr
John Fox
.
I have put your most interesting data on the Hess plane into my Hess file in case I do an updated edition of my book HESS
THE MISSING YEARS.

Letters Index


To
Order Books

| Auschwitz
Index |
Irving
Index |
Irving
Page |
Irving
Book-List
| Action
Report
| Other
FP Authors


Buchladen
| Auschwitz
| Irving-Verzeichnis
| -Hauptseite
| -Bücher
| Action
Report
| Weitere
FP-Autoren©Focal
Point 1998 write
to David Irving

Source Information
Original Publication: 1998-10-14
Digital Archive: Focal Point Publications
Accessed: June 3, 2026