I’M currently reading Ian Kershaw ‘s ”Hitler
1936-1945: Nemesis”.
You might be interested that in his ”List of Works
Cited” he mentions EIGHT of your works. He obviously does not regard you as a pseudo historian or someone who — what did The Belle of Emory
University say? — someone who “bends the facts” to suit his own ideological agenda!
Since the book has been well received by many of the court historians how do the ”traditional enemies of truth” reconcile this apparent contradiction?
Joe M.
* Identity withheld at our discretion. Related item on
this website