⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
your “holes” index earlier interlocutory hearings September 11, 1998 September 15, 1998 October 2, 1998 December 15, 1998 January 26, 1999 April 23, 1999the witnesses and statements: David Irving Deborah Lipstadt Dr K Arnold Bernie M Farber Rebecca Guttman Robert Horenstein Warren Kinsella Vladimir N Kuzelenkov Daniel Levitas Peter Millar Peter Pringle Andrew Rosenheim Vladimir Tarasov Tatiana Vasilyeva Eric K Ward Steven M Wasserstrom the reports by experts: Christopher Browning Richard Evans
Peter Longerich Robert Jan Van Pelt Civil Evidence Act Notice the verbatim Day 1: Jan 11, 2000 Day 2: Jan 12, 2000 Day 3: Jan 13, 2000 Day 4: Jan 17, 2000 Day 5: Jan 18, 2000 Day 6: Jan 19, 2000 Day 7: Jan 20, 2000 Day 8: Jan 24, 2000 Day 9: Jan 25, 2000 Day 10: Jan 26, 2000 Day 11: Jan 28, 2000 Day 12: Jan 31, 2000 Day 13: Feb 1, 2000 Day 14: Feb 2, 2000 Day 15: Feb 3, 2000 Day 16: Feb 7, 2000 Day 17: Feb 8, 2000 Day 18: Feb 10, 2000 Day 19: Feb 14, 2000 Day 20: Feb 15, 2000 Day 21: Feb 16,
2000 Day 22: Feb 17, 2000 Day 23: Feb 21, 2000 Day 24: Feb 23, 2000 Day 25: Feb 24, 2000 Day 26: Feb 28, 2000 Day 27: Feb 29, 2000 Day 28: Mar 1, 2000 Day 29: Mar 2, 2000 Day 30: Mar 6, 2000 Day 31: Mar 14, 2000 Day 32: Mar 15, 2000 Prize Day etc., as available Our dossier: The fight over Mr Irving’s seized possessions and archives Jonathan Josephs is studying the Lipstadt trial for his dissertation, and has two queries, .
Arriving at the High Court, January 11, 2000 About Lipstadt and Vienna THANKS for your prompt reply. If you could just answer these couple of questions it would help me out a lot. Do you think you were unjustly treated in your trials? You have experienced court in a country where they have laws banning Holocaust denial. What is your opinion of these laws? Are they an affront to freedom of speech?
As you know I do intend to include what you say in my dissertation, so what would you like to say in general terms about the various issues raised by this subject which seems to arouse such intense emotion. I am grateful to you for your time and trouble and thank you in anticipation of your reply. Jonathan Josephs reply
See Also
- Day 2: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript (Document)
- Day 1: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript (Document)
- the Lipstadt Trial (Document)
- David Irving v Penguin & Lipstadt — Jan 1995 (Article)
- David Irving vs. Penguin Books & Deborah Lipstadt (Document)