Free Download: Readers write about David Irving’s Lawsuit against Deborah Lipstadt (September 1998)

your “holes” index earlier interlocutory hearings September 11, 1998 September 15, 1998 October 2, 1998 December 15, 1998 January 26, 1999 April 23, 1999the witnesses and statements: David Irving Deborah Lipstadt Dr K Arnold Bernie M Farber Rebecca Guttman Robert Horenstein Warren Kinsella Vladimir N Kuzelenkov Daniel Levitas Peter Millar Peter Pringle Andrew Rosenheim Vladimir Tarasov Tatiana Vasilyeva Eric K Ward Steven M Wasserstrom the reports by experts: Christopher Browning Richard Evans

Peter Longerich Robert Jan Van Pelt Civil Evidence Act Notice the verbatim Day 1: Jan 11, 2000 Day 2: Jan 12, 2000 Day 3: Jan 13, 2000 Day 4: Jan 17, 2000 Day 5: Jan 18, 2000 Day 6: Jan 19, 2000 Day 7: Jan 20, 2000 Day 8: Jan 24, 2000 Day 9: Jan 25, 2000 Day 10: Jan 26, 2000 Day 11: Jan 28, 2000 Day 12: Jan 31, 2000 Day 13: Feb 1, 2000 Day 14: Feb 2, 2000 Day 15: Feb 3, 2000 Day 16: Feb 7, 2000 Day 17: Feb 8, 2000 Day 18: Feb 10, 2000 Day 19: Feb 14, 2000 Day 20: Feb 15, 2000 Day 21: Feb 16,

2000 Day 22: Feb 17, 2000 Day 23: Feb 21, 2000 Day 24: Feb 23, 2000 Day 25: Feb 24, 2000 Day 26: Feb 28, 2000 Day 27: Feb 29, 2000 Day 28: Mar 1, 2000 Day 29: Mar 2, 2000 Day 30: Mar 6, 2000 Day 31: Mar 14, 2000 Day 32: Mar 15, 2000 Prize Day etc., as available Donald Bady throws more light on the profound wisdom of “Skunky” Evans about World War Two,

on February 2, 2008 David Irving sharing a joked with former Reich Minister Albert Speer over dinner at the Frankfurt Book Fair in 1979. “Skunky” Evans and his grandma’s unexploded bomb THIS relates to the discussion about sabotage in the German munitions industry that we had during lunch at the Berkeley last May [2007]. Adam Tooze ‘s book The Wages of Destruction was reviewed in the New York Review of Books by your unloved “Colleague” Richard J. Evans .

The review gave rise to a letter from a scientist, John Diebold , who commented on the impact of forced labour in armaments production. Saying that he had experience with German explosives made in 1939-1940 and then found that those produced from 1943 to be “…typically weak or noneffective.

This difference I ascribe either to intentional sabotage by the ‘Jews and concentration camp inmates’ or to the simple substituion of inert materials for active ones by munitions plant managers, presumably due to the conflict between production quotas and availablility of nitrates. Speer was apparently not above “production for production’s sake” with a blind eye to quality control…”.

Well, apart from this tidbit, Evans replies to Diebold “…No one can be sure how widespread sabotage by munitions workers was, but there is plenty of anecdotal evidence, including a story I can contribute myself. A German bomb fell through the roof of my wife’s grandmother’s house in the East End of London in 1943 and lodged, unexploded, in her bedroom wardrobe. When the bomb disposal unit opened it up, they found a note inside: “Don’t worry, English” it said, “we’re with you.

Polish workers.” Small world – what do you think ? Donald Bady (an American munitions expert) reply