⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
Documents on Real
HistoryIndex
to the Traditional Enemies of Free
Speech Alphabetical index (text)
Letters to David
Irving on this Website
Francesco
Ariis
asks from
Italy, , about the Fred
Leuchter Report on Auschwitz
Photo
: Professor Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zündel (at rear), Fred Leuchter in
Toronto
Tell us about Fred Leuchter’s part!
I AM an Italian reader of yours who stumbled in your writings after some personal research on the holocaust.
I’ve read the Leuchter report and was pointed out a web page (Nizkor) which tries to refute Mr.
Leuchter‘s thesis. I’m by no means an historian and I’m interested in your opinion on this research (or if you can point me to additional material on the topic).
I know you are busy with your work and, sadly, busy defending yourself from absurd accusations which try to limit your (our) right of freedom of speech, so don’t worry if you cannot answer to my mail.
David
Irving answers:
LEUCHTER’S work was limited to digging out thirty or more samples from the fabric of buildings popularly identified as homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz.
This required no special skill.
He handed the samples to a professional forensic laboratory in America for testing. This laboratory had the requisite special skill. It found no significant trace of cyanide compounds in the samples he provided from the homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz, but massive quantities in the brickwork of a fumigation chamber used to fumigate clothing.
(Humorous note: After they were informed that the samples came from Auschwitz, the laboratory director said that in that case he might have found a different result!)
I read Leuchter’s report with the appendices, the laboratory report tables, in April 1988 and was very impressed. I still am. It does not mean that there were no gassings in Auschwitz, but it certainly casts doubts about any part that those buildings may have played. Since big money is involved, really Big Money, you will understand why
Mr Leuchter became an object of hatred and a target for arrest and professional persecution.
-
Our dossier
on Auschwitz -
Our
dossier on Leuchter -
Our dossier on
Hitler -
Lipstadt throws a tantrum (because the US Supreme Court takes Fred Leuchter seriously?) | more
Free download of all David Irving’s books Bookmark the download page to find the latest new free books
© Focal Point 2007 David Irving
See Also
- Why They Did Not Call Auschwitz Survivors as Witnesses (Document)
- Holocaust Denial (Article)
- It appeared in Holocaust and Genocide studies (Document)
- The Holocaust (Document)
- Real History and Propaganda Stories about Auschwitz (Document)