⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
Historical Documentation Notice

This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.

The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.

Paul Barford

Letters to David
Irving on this Website


Unless correspondents ask us not to, this Website will post selected letters that it receives and invite open debate.

A
S Marques
writes from
Portugal on


Van
Pelt’s “moral certainty” about Auschwitz

Van
Pelt countered that argument, and similar ones, saying
that evidence and testimony in the years since World War
II made it a “moral certainty” that gas chambers were the
main instruments of murder at Auschwitz between the
summer of 1942 and fall of 1944. His report explains at
some length the difference between “moral certainty” and
other types of certainty.

Moral certainty is based on
quality of evidence and is the best certainty a historian
can have, he said. “It’s a very particular technical
term.”

— The Van Pelt interview in Canadian
Jewish News

WONDERFUL stuff. During the
trial, Van Pelt actually says his expression “moral
certainty” is taken from Bishop Wilkins.

And Wilkins
clearly meant a certainty that God exists through the
observation of his works and “natural laws”. Some
“technical” term for a supposed historian debating
historical problems! I have this moral certainty that
Napoleon lost at Waterloo. Sounds very, very technical
historical jargon.

A
S Marques


Website comment: In fact Van Pelt (fee:
£109,000) used the term in his Report [download
as pdf]; Mr Irving mocked this in his closing
statement on March 15 (Day
32) | To write
to Van Pelt


Free
downloads
of David Irving’s books:–> bookmark
this page to find new downloads

David Irving

Source Information
Original Publication: 2000-04-26
Digital Archive: Focal Point Publications
Accessed: June 3, 2026