More on the “holes” in the “gas chamber” roof (Crowell171200)

Documents on the
allegation about Zyklon B killings of victims in Nazi
concentration camps

Controversy: Are or were there ever holes in the roof of the Leichenkeller (Morgue) No. 1 at Krema (crematiorium) II at Auschwitz — the holes through which SS officers allegedly poured in the Zyklon B crystals?

Sunday, December 17, 2000

See David Irving closing
speech, page 31.

Website photo of Krema II, Leichenkeller 1, underside of roof

Samuel Crowell has these comments on the remarks of Brian
Renk:

THE entire issue of the holes in the roof only became an issue, as far as I know, from the publication of Jean-Caude Pressac’s
Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers in
1989. In that book, on page 436, he made the following admission which I have quoted elsewhere:

According
to the American aerial photograph of 24th August 1944,
the four introduction points were located along a line
running the length of the room in the
EASTERN half. In the present
ruins, two of these openings are still visible at the
southern end but in the WESTERN
half. Nobody up to now seems to have been concerned by
this contradiction, nor to have explained
it.

These holes apparently correspond to Charles
Provan’s “hole No. 2” (Mazal’s No. 1), and “Hole
No. 7”, dismissed by both. These also appear to be the largest holes.

Turning to Prof. Robert Jan van Pelt, we are reminded that he claimed that the holes for gas induction are no longer visible, whereas all of the holes cited by Provan are visible. We are further reminded that van Pelt insisted under cross examination that there would have been no “induction column” near Pillar No. 1, the approximate location of Provan’s hole
No. 2.

From a common sense perspective we should keep in mind that everyone is looking at the same roof. Pressac could not find four holes in line, instead he found two largish holes off center. He dismissed the rest. He found no holes that fit the proper location of such holes, even taking into account the shift you described.

It was Pressac’s failure to find the right holes that inspired Robert Faurisson’s barb of “No Holes, No
Holocaust.” Unfortunately, the use of a phrase like that easily leads to a misunderstanding, that is, it leads people to think that the discovery of any hole in the roof thereby
“proves the Holocaust” or, to be precise, proves that half a million people were gassed in the basement of Krema II.
Evidently, Mr.

Provan took Faurisson a little too literally and noted that there were many holes in the roof.

Likewise, van Pelt has looked at the same roof. He doubtless is aware of all the apertures Pressac and Provan have commented on, and does not consider them adequate to the role.

Hence
his famous idea of a hapless enlisted man furiously
filling in the holes while the explosives are being
laid.

It so happens that whether or not there were or are holes in the roof has never been very important for my own approach to the problem, since roof apertures and chimneys would not be uncommon for bomb shelters.

However, I note that Germar Rudolf’s journal recently quoted a former employee of Huta who claimed that there were no holes in the reinforced concrete ceiling, and that it would have been counter-productive to have them, since the dual use of the basements of the crematoria for air raid shelter purposes was envisioned from the start.

However I would make the following common sense observations:

• The photographic evidence indicates that, if there
  were holes, they were in line.
• We know that the roof was poured with no provision
  for such holes. If the roof had been poured with such
  holes, we should not have difficulty finding them.

  On the
  other hand, it is apparent that the holes — if they
  existed — were created after the concrete was
  poured.

• In that case, we would still expect to find a
  symmetrical series of four holes, similarly cut,
  similarly dressed, similar in size, and in line. It
  appears that there are no such holes, not even one.
• Such holes would have to have had the steel
  reinforcing bars removed, otherwise it would have been
  impossible to remove the Zyklon B pellets.

  As far I know,
  none of the holes fit that requirement.

• Such holes would also have to large enough to allow
  for Zyklon B pellet recovery, since as we recall from
  Pressac the Zyklon was supposedly recovered in a kind of
  contraption at the end of a wire inside of the wire mesh
  cage.
• Common sense also tells us that basic provisions
  would have been made for sealing and making these holes
  gastight; as you note, there is no evidence of this.
• Common sense also tells us that if

  we find a hole we
  should also find the remnants of the concrete chimney on
  top and the wire mesh cage below. As you also note there
  is no evidence of this.

If the holes of Messrs. Provan and Mazal are offered as proof, I think it is important to stress that Messrs.
Pressac and van Pelt have looked at the same holes, and have found them wanting.

“Samuel Crowell”
is the nom de plume of a schoolteacher living in New
England, an expert on the Auschwitz site, who has asked
us for evident reasons to preserve his identity.

• Brian Renk: Some
  Preliminary Observations on the Charles D. Provan booklet
  ‘No Holes? No Holocaust? A Study of the Holes in the Roof
  of Leichenkeller I of Krematorium 2 at Birkenau’
• Brian Renk has further
  comments on Charles Provan and his discovery of
  “holes”

© Focal Point
2000 write to David Irving