More on the “holes” in the “gas chamber” roof

As indicated earlier, Holes #1 and #3 are both quite visible and are not in the proper location according to the aerial photo, or to any possibility of being in line with the supporting pillars.

Indeed, as was suggested previously, there are numerous “holes” in the roof if one takes any crack in the concrete as constituting a “gas induction port.”The photos of Hole #2 still cannot be located in the larger photo, but that is easily explained by the presence of a shoe in one of the photos which indicates that the dimensions of this hole — intact rebar and all — could scarcely be more than 4″-5” inches square.

Since the traditional dimensions of these holes was supposed to be on the order of over two feet square (70 cm), this hole cannot meaningfully be characterized as a “gas induction port.”Finally, to characterize the crack on the Northern end of the roof as “Hole #4” is to use the term “hole” very expansively.

The photos of Hole #2 still cannot be located in the larger photo, but that is easily explained by the presence of a shoe in one of the photos which indicates that the dimensions of this hole — intact rebar and all — could scarcely be more than 4″-5″ inches square.

Since the traditional dimensions of these holes was supposed to be on the order of over two feet square (70 cm), this hole cannot meaningfully be characterized as a “gas induction port.”Finally, to characterize the crack on the Northern end of the roof as “Hole #4” is to use the term “hole” very expansively. Finally, to characterize the crack on the Northern end of the roof as “Hole #4” is to use the term “hole” very expansively.

To repeat some well known facts: In summary, it appears that Mr. Mazal has gone to a lot of time and expense to identify two holes that are well known, and well known as being in the wrong position, along with several other cracks which he has baptised as “gas induction ports.”

What makes this truly strange is that neither Pressac nor his epigone Van Pelt consider these holes to be legitimate candidates for “gas induction ports” so that Mazal’s labors have had the unintended consequence of contradicting the very experts he seeks to support.