⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
IN FACT documents disclosed by Lipstadt under English trial procedures indicated that in her original book draft she had not even mentioned Mr Irving — so much for his being the most “dangerous” on her list. When she submitted the draft to her paymasters, the criminal fraudster Robert Maxwell and
Yad Vashem, however, the latter’s Yehuda Bauer wrote back to her regretting that she had not found it necessary to include Mr Irving, and instructed the US
scholar to list him too. By refusing to give testimony in the trial, she was able to evade questioning about her earlier omission.
See Also
- David Irving v Penguin & Lipstadt — Jan 1995 (Article)
- Index: Lipstadt Trial Documents (Article)
- The defeat of the denierDanuta Kean reports on how Penguin p (Article)
- Irving v Lipstadt: Trial Documents (German language) (Article)
- Documents on David Irving's early clashes with Professor Deborah Lipstadt (Article)