⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
SHATTERED by his ordeal in cross examination at the hands of Zündel’s counsel Douglas Christie, Browning refused to testify again in the later Zündel trials, not wanting to go through that — ever — again. In the Lipstadt trial, he behaved badly: he tried to withdraw evidence in his report when Mr Irving spotted that he had deliberately omitted passages from his selected passages from the so-called Gerstein Report which completely invalidated his arguments and exposed
Kurt
Gerstein as a liar. The judge ordered that both
versions of the Browning report be introduced in the
Lipstadt trial, which provided Mr Irving with a happy hunting ground in his cross examination of this “scholar”.
See Also
- David Irving v Penguin & Lipstadt — Jan 1995 (Article)
- Index: Lipstadt Trial Documents (Article)
- The defeat of the denierDanuta Kean reports on how Penguin p (Article)
- Irving v Lipstadt: Trial Documents (German language) (Article)
- Documents on David Irving's early clashes with Professor Deborah Lipstadt (Article)