Irving’s Case Getting Aid from Aussie

All our website visitors should read and savour this article in the United States’ premier Jewish newspaper.

It mocks any suggestion that they operate as a “global conspiracy” — yet here is a New York editor pulling strings with
Australian Jewish and World Jewish Congress
leaders to put pressure on the Australian government to
“reprimand” an anonymous civil servant for providing expert assistance in his own time for a High Court action being fought in Britain. . .

Leibler seeks reprimand

Irving’s
Case Getting Aid from Aussie

Mills, a Civil servant, Playing Role in
Trial

by Blake Eskin
Forward Staff

NEW YORK — An Australian civil servant is advising provocateur David Irving in his
Holocaust-denial libel suit against Emory University professor Deborah Lipstadt. Michael Mills, an asset manager for the Department of Finance and
Administration at Canberra, provided Mr. Irving with 32
pages of detailed questions for his cross-examination last month of an expert witness for Ms.

Lipstadt, Peter
Longerich, in the trial under way in London. Mr. Mills is a regular participant in an on-line Holocaust discussion group for academics, where is identified by his Australian governmental e-mail address.

Mr. Mills’s briefing — which formed the basis for Mr.
Irving’s attack on a 134-page report by Mr. Longerich, a professor at the University of London — is a further sign of support from Down Under for Mr. Irving, who has been refused an
Australian entry visa since 1993; This month’s number of
Australian Style, a glossy magazine of which Rupert Murdoch’s son Lachlan is a director, includes a flattering profile of Mr.

Irving by
Helen Darville, who compared him to Winston
Churchill and who stopped just short of saying that Mr.
Irving is the victim of an international Jewish conspiracy.
Ms.

Darville is best known in Australia for posing as a
Ukrainian immigrant named Helen
Demidenko and writing a purportedly autobiographical and critically acclaimed novel blaming Jewish Communists for famine in the Ukraine and other Soviet atrocities, and using this to justify Ukrainian complicity with the Nazis. In the same issue, Australian Style published an excerpt for Mr. Irving’s web site.

Mr. Mills’s unofficial briefs also show that although Mr. Irving is acting as his own attorney in the British High Court, Mr. Irving is not entirely alone in his lawsuit.

On its face, the suit attempts to show that Ms.
Lipstadt libeled Mr. Irving by calling him a
Holocaust denier.

But the legal action also forces Ms. Lipstadt,
Mr. Longerich and other Holocaust scholars to engage Mr. Irving in debate.

Mr. Irving has said that the gas chambers at
Auschwitz wee not used for mass murder and has made other counterhistorical statements about the
Holocaust.

Ms Lipstadt described him as “one of the most dangerous spokespersons for Holocaust denial” in her 1993 book “Denying the
Holocaust.”

“Any implication that the government is a vehicle for any sort for this is unspeakable
and outrageous,” said the chairman of the governing board of the World Jewish Congress, Isi Leibler. “I think the government should reprimand him forthwith.”

Mr.
Leibler is a former head of the Australian Jewish community.

“I find it extremely disquieting,” the president of the
Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Nina Bassat, said of Mr. Mills’s role in the trial. “One assumes that government policy is developed with a historic impartiality and that people administering government policy come to it without bias.”

“Any implication that the government is a vehicle of any sort for this is unspeakable and outrageous,” said the chairman of the governing board of the World Jewish
Congress, Isi Leibler. “I think the government should reprimand him forthwith.” Mr. Leibler is a former head of the Australian Jewish community.

Mr.
Mills’s unofficial briefs examine paragraph by paragraph Mr.
Longerich’s argument that Hitler knew about the mass murder of the Jews, which, the historian writes, “followed a standardised pattern, were centrally directed and expressed the policy of the National Socialist regime.” Mr. Irving acknowledged the influence of Mr. Mills in the on-line diary he maintains on his web site.

“I cross examine somewhat better all afternoon, on the basis of the brief provided by Michael […]. an expert, of Australia,” Mr. Irving wrote. “A very useful brief it is too, and it helps to narrow down the issues, though it lengthens the cross-examination.” Mr. Mills told
The Forward that Mr. Irving invited him and other individuals on his electronic mailing list to comment on the expert opinions provided by Mr.

Longerich and historians Christopher Browning and
Robert Jan Van Pelt. Mr. Mills said in an e-mail that he declined Mr. Irving’s offer of payment, “as I am not permitted as a public servant to accept outside paid employment.” He said, however, that Mr. Irving had sent along a copy of his biography of Goebbels “as a token of appreciation.”

Mr. Mills said he prepared his reports at home on his own time. “I do not think I have used the name of the Australian
Government, or its resources, in the work that I did on the
Expert Opinions,” he said.

Mr. Mills is a frequent contributor to H-Holocaust, an electronic mailing list for a primarily academic audience.
His H-Holocaust postings include his Australian government e-mail address, and some, but not all, include a disclaimer that “the above views are mine and not those of my employer.”

A subscriber to H-Holocaust, Gabriel
Schoenfeld of
Commentary magazine, recognised
Mr. Mills as the “Michael” in Mr. Irving’s diary.

“I regard myself as a dissident researcher,” Mr. Mills said, and in some spheres, such as H-Holocaust, he has been taken as such. Some of his H-Holocaust messages question the sourcing or reliability of statistics. In one posting earlier this year, Mr.

Mills wrote, “It is legitimate to adopt a critical attitude toward the relatively large number of Jews who particularly in the first decade after the
Bolshevik revolution collaborated with the Soviet Government in the persecution of other peoples.”

Mr. Mills has been banned from
the on-line Holocaust discussion forum at About.com. The
guide to the About.com Holocaust site, Jen
Rosenberg, told the Forward she
removes messages from
individuals who espouse Holocaust denial or “revisionism”
and blocks repeat offenders from participating in its
forum.

A times, Mr. Irving seems to have strayed from Mr.
Mills’s briefing on Mr. Longerich. For example, where Mr.
Mills suggests that Mr. Irving ask Mr. Longerich to say whether he fund the phrase Vernichtung durch Arbeit,
or extermination through work, in a particular communication of Himmler’s. Mr. Irving in court repeatedly asks Mr.
Longerich to admit that the phrase was invented after the war. Mr. Longerich replies repeatedly that it was a phrase used during the war.

Mr. Mills said he also prepared a report on the expert testimony of Mr. Browning, but he did not think it had much influence on Mr. Irving’s testimony.

Of Mr. Irving, Mr. Mills said, “I do not necessarily agree with any statement he has made in regard to what happened at Auschwitz, now I necessarily disagree with his statements.” He defended Mr.

Irving’s publication of the
Leuchter
Report, which said, based on a faulty chemical analysis, that the gas chambers at Auschwitz could not have been used at such. “The investigations made by Leuchter, even if inaccurate and perhaps tendentious, are something that should have been done long ago, in a more competent way,”
Mr. mills said, in a 1998 review on amazon.com. Mr.

Mills questions the accuracy of
“Fragments” five months before the authenticity of the purported holocaust memoir was publicly challenged by Swiss writer Daniel Ganzfried.
“If Wilkomirski’s memories of childhood concentration camp experiences are indeed genuine, it is most probable that they are to be located at Buchenwald rather than at
Majdanek,” Mr. Mills wrote.
“Fragments” has been withdrawn from the market by its publishers.

Mr.
Mills also comments off-line on the Holocaust and on matters affecting Jews. In January he wrote letters to Canberra newspapers defending Konrad Kalejs, an Australian citizen who has been accused of leading Nazi death squads that killed 30,000 Jews in his native Latvia.

And in 1997, Mr Mills wrote to The
Canberra Times concerning the death of one of the
Australian Maccabiah athletes who died after a bridge in
Israel collapsed, throwing them into a polluted river. “It seems ironic that this person, whose participation in the
Maccabiah Games may reasonably be interpreted as indicating a strong commitment to the Zionist enterprise, should have lost her life as a direct result of the ‘redemption’ inflicted on this unhappy land by her fellow Jews,” Mr.
Mills wrote.

Ms. Bassat criticised the letter about the Maccabiah bridge collapse.

“Forgetting any racial undertones, any anti-Semitic content, it was an extraordinarily cruel letter, and it makes you wonder about the quality of mercy of a person like that. He was making political capital of personal tragedy.”

Website hint: If you wish to congratulate Gabriel
Schoenfeld, or express admiration for his liberal
mindset, click on his name.