Dieter Wisliceny (Observer080701)

Posted
Monday, July 9, 2001

Alphabetical index (text)

London Sunday, July 8, 2001

[all pictures and side panels
added by this website]

British spy’s early alert on Holocaust Discovery poached from Chilean cable raises question of why Jews were kept in the dark about the Final Solution

Peter Beaumont, foreign affairs editor

AN agent working for Britain’s wartime intelligence services alerted the Allies to the Nazi plan to eradicate the Jews of Europe in late 1941, two months before the Wannsee conference that rubber-stamped
Hitler’s Final Solution.

David Irving reminisces:

RICHARD Overy? A historian? What a small world. Wasn’t he the historian who, while reviewing somebody else’s book, accidentally put into my mouth the words actually uttered by Adolf Hitler in the
1920s (I published the transcript), that he had always hated the Jews as a race and religion, and that if he ever came to power he would see that there was a solution to the Jewish problem?

A little misquotation which cost a famous English
Sunday newspaper £45,000 in libel damages in
1996.

A British intelligence document held in the US National
Archives and declassified last week shows that Britain was warned about Hitler’s plans for the Jews after ‘a most secret’ British source ‘poached’ diplomatic cables written by a fanatically pro-Nazi Chilean diplomat in Prague.

The revelation that Britain and the US — which was passed the cable in March 1942 — were warned so early in the war is certain to fuel the bitter historical debate over whether the Allies should have done more to prevent the
Holocaust — which claimed the lives of six million Jews — or at least warn its potential victims.

It also comes amid fresh
revelations — in a book to be published in the autumn by
Richard Overy, a British military historian
[see box on
right] — claiming to identify
for the first
time the order for the Final
Solution signed in Hitler’s name.

The warning was contained in a document prepared by
Gonzalo Montt Rivas, Chile’s flamboyant consul in
Prague, then under Nazi occupation.

The cable is one of nearly three million US intelligence documents relating to the Holocaust declassified under the
Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act enacted by President Bill
Clinton.

In November 1941, the anti-Semitic Montt was one of the last ‘neutral’ diplomats in Prague, a fact not unconnected with the revelation that he had been recruited to provide information to Walter Schellenberg, the head of the
Foreign Intelligence Branch of the Reich Security Main
Office.

[Hitler, Puttkamer, Himmler]Montt,
48, was a dapper former soldier who had fought in the
Paraguayan army and enjoyed a taste for fine wine, fine food and women. As an agent of Schellenberg, he would have enjoyed access to senior Gestapo officials in Prague.

Through his connections, Montt remained remarkably well-informed about the German policy towards the Jews.

His own views were made clear when he advised that Chile should avoid taking even ‘baptised Jews’ fleeing from Europe as he believed that even ‘baptismal water’ could not cleanse the ‘filth accumulated during centuries in ghettoes’.

By 25 November, secret talks were under way that would seal the fate of the Jews. Germany was still riding high on a wave of euphoria after its surprise attack on Soviet
Russia and Hitler had turned his mind to settling the Jewish
‘problem’.

Hitler had given the task of solving this ‘problem’ to
Heinrich Himmler, the head of the Gestapo, and to
Rheinhard Heydrich
(below), then based in Prague, who two months later would chair the Wannsee conference.

Montt filed his cable to Santiago on 24 November. Twenty-four hours later, Germany would announce the Eleventh Decree —
that the property of Jews who had fled would be forfeited.

A day before the decree was published, Montt had obtained and translated it for the diplomatic pouch. With it he included his reflections on the future for the Jews of
Czechoslovakia and Europe.

‘The German triumph,’ he noted, ‘will leave Europe free of Semites. Those who escape with their lives from this trial will certainly be deported to Siberia.’ Montt added that as US rhetoric and military action against the Nazis accelerated, so ‘Germany will expedite the destruction of
Semitism’.

Professor Richard Breitman, a historian at the US
National Archives, says: ‘This is certainly the earliest piece of evidence we have that Britain and the US were warned about the coming genocide. It predates by months the
British Postal and Telegraph Censorship Office report that would claim the Nazis were planning to exterminate the
Jews.

‘Right now, it is impossible to know why it was not acted on,’ says Breitman, regarded as an expert on the planning of the Holocaust. ‘My guess, though, is that this was not an isolated document.’

The Montt cable raises important questions about the fate of intelligence gathered first by Britain — and passed to the US — about the Nazi’s treatment of the Jews.

From September 1939, Breitman says, British codebreakers had been reading messages of the German Order Police responsible for mass killings of Polish Jews.

By June [sic] 1941, the codebreakers were decoding SS signals describing the massacre of Jews in the Soviet Union — a fact Breitman believes was known to Winston Churchill, but to which he did not allude in his blanket condemnation of Nazi executions in a speech in August 1941 which did not refer specifically to the Jews.

That Churchill knew Jews were being massacred, says
Breitman, was acknowledged on 12 September 1941 when MI6
staff concluded in a note that

‘the fact that the police are
killing all Jews that fall into their hands [in the
Soviet Union] should by now be sufficiently well
appreciated. It is not therefore proposed to continue
reporting these butcheries specifically [to the Prime
Minister]’.

It was against this background that the Montt cable was received.

‘There is something discomfiting,’ says Breitman (left), ‘about the conclusion that a document today considered an important source about
Nazi policy had limited impact on Western governments. It prompted no Western action to warn potential Jewish victims.’ He concedes that for many the priority was the war
— not the atrocities that accompanied it.

‘The reason this document is important,’ says Overy, professor of modern history at King’s College London, ‘is that it appears to confirm that a decision had been made by
October 1941 to exterminate the Jews. In Adolf
Eichmann’s interrogation he recalled that a decision had been made by mid-October.’

Equally important was the fact that the Allies had been warned within a month of that decision.

Overy’s book, Interrogations , published in September, will add one of the final missing pieces to genesis of the
Final Solution, proof that Hitler ordered the genocide.
Overy found it in an account of a long-vanished command to
Heinrich Himmler to order Heydrich to begin the killing.

The order was shown by Eichmann — with Himmler and
Heydrich one of the architects of the genocide — to
Dieter Wisliceny, his lieutenant, in spring
1942.

Revising the Revisionists

PROFESSOR
OVERY lags way behind the times if he regards
Wisliceny’s statement to his Nuremberg captors (he was eventually extradited to Czechoslovakia and hanged) as conclusive proof of Hitler’s complicity.

This article does however concede the barren state of evidence even now, fifty years later — and despite the 6 million dollars poured into the Lipstadt trial: namely that “proof that Hitler ordered the genocide” is still regarded as
“missing”.

This website will start a dossier on Dieter
Wisliceny and invites submissions. The press may like to have material that supports or rebuts
Overy’s whimperings readily at hand.

Although not mentioned in Wisliceny’s affidavit during his
war crimes trial, Overy found the reference in his long
buried interrogation. The order he was shown, said
Wisliceny, was signed by Himmler. Beneath it were the words
‘on the orders of the Führer’.

But the mystery remains how Britain acquired Montt’s dispatch. Breitman believes that the British spy was either working in the Chilean embassy or that British agents in
Bermuda were opening diplomatic bags sent across the
Atlantic by South American diplomats.

© 2001 Guardian
Newspapers Ltd

The above news item is reproduced without editing other than typographical

to go on the Mailing List to receive

©
Focal Point
2001 write to David
Irving