David Irving repeats ‘Holocaust denier’ accusations against himself on his Web site

Posted Friday,
February 4, 2000

Alphabetical index (text)

ARTS | Shelf Life
| p. B4

David
Irving repeats ‘Holocaust denier’ accusations against himself on his Web site

ABOUT to hit its second month is an unusual and expensive libel trial in which the party claiming damages is amplifying the libel by publishing all the trial materials on the Internet. British historian David Irving, whose
Goebbels biography hit the reefs of public scorn in 1996 and was pulled by its publisher, has brought a
claim in the British High Courts against the writer Deborah Lipstadt
and her publishers, Penguin.

Irving, who testified on behalf of
Ernst Zundel at his Toronto 1988
“false news” retrial, claims in court documents that Lipstadt’s book,
Denying the
Holocaust: The Growing Aassault on Truth and Memory, accuses him of being
“an ardent admirer” of Hitler and having “consorted with anti-Israel, anti-Semitic and Holocaust denial forces.”

Since under strict British libel laws, defendants assume the burden of proving their claims in court, Lipstadt and
Penguin have gathered together a battery of renowned lawyers and experts, including
Cambridge University historian Richard
Evans. With access to thousands of letters, videotaped speeches and diaries, including a verse Irving wrote to his one-year-old “Baby Aryan” daughter, Evans has prepared a 740-page document to debunk Irving’s related claims.

Since British rules of procedure demand that before trials each side reveals witnesses and what they intend to say in court, Evans’ treatise has already appeared in public — strangely enough, on
Irving’s Web site, www.fpp.co.uk, along with a host of other materials that drag Irving through the mud.

Trial onlookers include the Canadian
Web site Nizkor, www.almanac.bc.ca/hweb, devoted to confronting claims diminishing or denying the Holocaust, and Penguin
U.K., www.penguin.co.uk, which has published its own opening statement calling Irving a “falsifier of history” and a “Holocaust denier.”

The dispute has posed a difficult question for observers: Is Irving’s mission to win, or to force Holocaust historians to engage him in a theatrical debate on even ground? Irving’s limited assets and vulnerability are bound to make any win for Lipstadt and Penguin a pyrrhic one, allowing a martyred Irving to broadcast, via the courts, the newspapers and the Internet, a kind of virtual history no mainstream publisher would be likely to touch. – Dan Glove,
National Post

OF
course that there may have been more
orthodox reasons for bringing a libel
action does not occur to these
journalists’ minds.

The
above news item is reproduced without editing other
than typographical