⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
Posted Sunday, July 11,
1999
WE
REPRODUCE with acknowledgements (see
below) this article
…
ETC
July 10, 1999
Appeals
court judges said Het Parool violated
the copyright to “The Diary of Anne
Frank,” which is held by the Basel,
Switzerland-based Anne Frank Funds, an
organization that also holds commercial
rights to the diarist’s
image.
http://www.newsday.com/ap/rnmpin0c.htm
Paper
Loses Anne Frank Dispute
By WILLIAM J. KOLE Associated
Press Writer
AMSTERDAM,
Netherlands (AP)
—
An Amsterdam newspaper broke copyright laws by publishing newly discovered pages of
Anne Frank‘s diary, an appeals court has ruled, ordering the paper to print a front-page apology.
Friday’s ruling against the daily
Het Parool overturned an earlier district court decision that the paper had done nothing wrong by publishing excerpts from new diary entries within days of their surprise discovery last August.
Appeals court judges said Het Parool
violated the copyright to
“The Diary of
Anne Frank,” which is held by the Basel, Switzerland-based Anne Frank
Funds, an organization that also holds commercial rights to the diarist’s image.
The court said the newspaper illegally encroached on the Swiss group’s claims to the young Jewish diarist’s best-selling account of hiding from the Nazis.
In a public apology Friday, Het
Parool acknowledged it had printed pages “which hadn’t been made public earlier” and did so without permission from the Anne Frank Funds.
Calls to the Swiss organization went unanswered Saturday.
It was not immediately clear whether the appeals court also would rule on similar complaints brought by the Anne
Frank Funds against the Dutch makers of a new documentary film about the girl and against Melissa Muller, the German author of a new book on the teen-age diarist. Both of those projects quote at length from the new pages without permission.
The pages caused a sensation when they surfaced last summer, when longtime Frank family confidant Cor Suijk revealed that Anne’s father, Otto Frank, gave him five handwritten sheets shortly before he died in 1980.
In the pages, Anne bitterly criticizes what she saw as her parents’ nearly loveless marriage.
Scholars speculate that her father withheld those pages to spare the family embarrassment.
Het Parool printed excerpts on
Aug. 26, and a few days later posted the pages on its Internet site. Within weeks, the Anne Frank Funds slapped the paper with a copyright infringement suit.
Het Parool argued it had broken no copyright rules because the pages ordinarily would have been published as part of the diary if Frank hadn’t kept them separate from the rest of the manuscript. Their sheer newsworthiness also justified publication, the newspaper said.
Anne’s diary documents the difficulties she and her family endured while hiding from the Nazis in an Amsterdam canal house from July 1942 until they were betrayed in the fall of 1944. Anne died of typhus in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp just weeks before it was liberated in the spring of 1945.
Her diary, which was published posthumously, has been translated into more than 50 languages and has sold millions of copies worldwide.
[Anne
Frank Index]The
above news item is reproduced without editing other
than typographical Register
your name and address
to go on the Mailing List to receive
[ Go back to AR Online Index
|
Index to AR.#14 |
Go to Main Action Report Index
]