Real History and Censorship by its Traditional Enemies The index to this Lipstadtscandal your Deborah Lipstadt index your Lipstadt Trial index [images and captions added by this website] Read the internal debate, necessarily rather one-sided, in JBooks .

Sample: “Can C-Span be sued? or somehow forced to issue an apology and make amends?” – Professor Gila Perach Hirsch, Vienna, Austria JBooks and the Deborah Lipstadt Trial A correspondent informs us: YOUR camel’s nose in the tent foray into the JBooks forum elicited some interesting comments, including a silly post by Debbie herself. Honestly, this issue of “what happened with the delicatessen” is hysterical.

I cannot think of a single narrative historian who doesn’t embellish in this way. I would recommend however for the sake of alliteration at least that everyone should google Göring goggling. — O.P. QUICK as a wink, just like the comments on her “blog”, the discussion of Debbie’s book has DISAPPEARED . No matter, I saved the page, which is attached . Amazing that those who now advocate freedom of speech for “Deniers” to “make fools of themselves” would not censor themselves out of existence.

I suppose it’s all your fault. — O.P. He adds: Please note the nice post below from JBooks: Re: Deborah Lipstadt Author: Edgar Katz Date: 03-21-05 09:56 Ms. Lipstadt, I must confess that I am somewhat confused by your attempts at silencing Mr. Irving because he is a “liar”. Ms Lipstadt, we are all liars here on God’s green earth, but this does not prohibit us from espousing our views. In other words, one need not prove their honesty or sincerity when presenting an argument prior to a debate.

The only thing that matters in a debate are the facts being discussed. Furthermore, I must tell you that no one has ever been pre-emptively disqualified from a debate because they are thought to be dishonest. The ultimate judge in a debate is the Truth, and not you or I. If he is indeed such an obvious liar and a fraud, then he should be no match for you, and who are you to deny us proof that he is what you say he is?

Thank you, Ed Katz WITHIN minutes after JBooks () deleted the entire thread of comments on Lipstadt’s book ( see archived copy ), the lone comment alone below appeared. It has now also disappeared. Tsk, tsk. Re: Deborah Lipstadt Author: Oberststuhlherr Date: 03-21-05 10:43 Ms. Lipstadt: I have to confess, I am fairly new to the topic of Nazi era revisionism. At least, in so much as I have taken it the least bit seriously.

I had been aware of the existence of such people as Ernst Zündel and David Irving. I had dismissed them as prevaricators and extremists. Recently, however, in the context of discussions with others about the various events and locations involved in the Nazi epoch, I begand to seek detailed information about the evidence of what had actually happened. What I discovered where a lot of statements of conclusions conjoined with alleged evidence which was neither persuasive, nor substantial.

One particular realm in which the evidence of what actually did take place seems quite ambiguous, and in many cases, intentionally misinterpreted, is that of the documentary evidence. Originally, I had trusted the English language translations; having given them a cursory review using a German-English dictionary. After finding many of the aspects of physical evidence lacking in persuasiveness, I decided to

See Also