David Irving's dossier on Auschwitz and other Nazi atrocities The AR-Online current issue news on your legal battle you and your family your career so far how to bu...
Annotations by Deborah Lipstadt to her essay DEBORAH E. LIPSTADT, DENYING THE HOLOCAUST: THE GROWING ASSAULT ON TRUST AND MEMORY (1993). For additional information regarding this trial, see Holocaust Denial on Trial , at http://www.holocaustdenialontrial.org (last visited Jan. 25, 2003). The informa...
Mr DUKE was introduced to Mr Irving at a function in Baton Rouge in about 1995. His views appear to be supported by an overwhelming majority of White voters in Louisiana, as he demonstrated in a gubernatorial race there. Democracy has its uses. (One suspects that Prof Lipstadt would not fare so well...
NOTE OF course the underlying implication of all this: Deborah Lipstadt did not have the evidence she needed at the time she wrote her lies, despite having canvassed all her pals, the ADL , the Board of Deputies of British Jews , the Institute of Jewish Affairs (who had secretly told newspapers that...
LIPSTADT misses the point. A historian's "stock in trade" is the secret material that he has acquired in a lifetime of research and hard field work. From the applications made by Lipstadt and her lawyers it was plain they wanted to gain access to these secret files, which had nothing to do with the
SHATTERED by his ordeal in cross examination at the hands of Zündel's counsel Douglas Christie , Browning refused to testify again in the later Zündel trials, not wanting to go through that -- ever -- again. In the Lipstadt trial, he behaved badly: he tried to withdraw evidence in his report when Mr...
THIS "NEUTRAL" expert witness and specialist on Hitler, Dr Peter Longerich, had an embarrassing moment with Mr Irving two years earlier. Lecturing at the German Institute in London on the evolution of Hitler's [non existent] decision to exeterminate all the Jews, he found Mr Irving in the audience.
THIS decision was made at a hearing on Directions. Mr Irving and Mr Julius had discussed the matter outside the Court, and Mr Irving had diffidently volunteered to Mr Julius, on the advice of his own legal experts, that he felt the case should be heard by a Judge alone. Depending on the identity of
Mr IRVING has kept a daily diary for forty years or more. The diaries fill around 50,000,000 words. The Defense asked him to produce all entries relating to their wish-list of names. It would have taken him two man-years to search all the entries. I.e. it was oppressive, and the Court was reluctant
THIS "NEUTRAL" expert witness and specialist about the extreme right, Dr Hajo Funke, while being a personable and engaging expert with whom Mr Irving enjoyed discussions during the court pauses, was not neutral either. He was an extreme left-wing agitator and revolutionary, as became clear to Mr Irv...
THAT is because there was none. Mr Irving occasionally received letters from such people, but rarely filed them. The defense were living in a dream world, in which a wish-list becomes reality even without being based on fact. In Court, Mr Irving asked one such defense expert, who had had privileged
Mr Irving writes: YES, A BLOOMSBURY bistro. I can never forget that on the evening after burying my oldest daughter one sad day three months before the trial began, I received an unexpected anonymous wreath, with a card attached to it that dripped with hatred. It read in effect "your daughter had it...
THE DEFENCE subsequently offered a plethora of reasons why they did not call Auschwitz survivors as witnesses. The obvious one might seem to be that they were fearful that their survivors would crack under cross-examination, as they did dramatically in the Zündel trial -- the most famous survivor of...
Real History and Lipstadt's Dog-and-Pony Show continued Nova Law Review Winter, 2002 27 Nova L. Rev. 243, pages 243 et seq. ESSAY Irving V. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Strategy part 2 S OUR strategy evolved, we not only decided what we would do, we also decided what we would
THIS whinge is a common, indeed comical, strain throughout all Lipstadt's articles about the trial: shock, horror, bafflement, and amazement that she is expected to prove that what she wrote is true. To an historian this seems so self-evident that the dismay of Professor Lipstadt seems almost laugha...
THE READER is left with the impression that Lipstadt is unfamiliar with the Dr Goebbels biography. In fact from late 1995 she and her Jewish pals masterminded the eventually successful campaign to blackmail and bludgeon St Martin's Press (SMP) into abandoning this project and violating their contrac...
Real History and the latest on Liar Lipstadt Posted Friday, November 1, 2002 your Lipstadt index your Lipstadt trial index where you will be speaking next news on your legal batt...
Real History and the latest on Liar Lipstadt Posted Sunday, November 3, 2002 your Lipstadt index your Lipstadt trial index where you will be speaking next news on your legal batt...
Does Emory's hiring of Deborah Lipstadt lower its standards? Letters to David Irving on this Website Unless correspondents ask us not to, this Website will post selected letters that it receives and invite open debate. your Lip...
Real History and Lipstadt's Dog-and-Pony Show your Lipstadt index your Lipstadt trial index where you will be speaking next news on your legal battle you and your family
PUBLISHED AT THEMORNINGNEWS.ORG ON 4 MAY 2005 Birnbaum v. Deborah Lipstadt Prejudice cannot be defeated entirely, but it can be fought and with courage and stamina, and with really good lawyers. Our bookish reporter in Boston Robert Birnbaum has a fascinating conversation with scholar Deborah Lipsta...
Real History and Lipstadt's Dog-and-Pony Show your Lipstadt index your Lipstadt trial index where you will be speaking next news on your legal battle you and your family