A
careful assessment based on
what we currently know, does
not reveal either a violation
of university policy, nor a
violation of law
— Robin Beck, University of
Pennsylvania, vice-president
for information systems and
computing
[All images and
hyperlinks are added by this
website]
Web warfare
Academics
who criticise Israeli actions against
the Palestinians are being targeted by
computer hackers. Lawrence Davidson
looks at a web war now raging in the UK
and the US
A NEW front in the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been opened in the US and the UK. It has not been opened by Islamic fundamentalists, or radical Palestinians, but by American and
Israeli computer hackers.
Action on this new front has taken the form of identity theft, harassment, incitement to harassment, defamation of character and malicious misrepresentation through the misuse and misappropriation of computer email facilities and lists. In the process, the reliability of the web-based system of communication has been undercut, the integrity of some very prestigious universities have been called into question, and the judgment of law enforcement authorities made to look tainted with bias.
Let me give a number of examples.
In early July, a recent graduate of the
University of Pennsylvania, Marc
Dworkin, using a university email account, sent a message to recipients of his email lists directing them to harass
Professor Mona Baker at University of Manchester Institute of Science and
Technology. His exact words, after giving
Professor Baker’s email address and telephone number, were “harrass (sic) the motherf*cker.”
This was his way of expressing his disagreement with Professor Baker over her support of the boycott of Israel. Soon
Professor Baker was receiving hundreds of obscene and threatening communications.
[Robin Beck]When the University of Pennsylvania’s vice-president for information systems and computing, Robin Beck, (right), was informed of this incident, her reply to Professor Baker was that a “careful assessment based on what we currently know, does not reveal either a violation of university policy, nor a violation of law”.
When it was pointed out to the university’s officials that Mr Dworkin’s actions had indeed violated Penn’s policies on acceptable use of electronic resources and guidelines on open expression (in fact his behaviour is also a possible violation of the Pennsylvania law on harassment and stalking by communication or address) they still refused to take any action.
Why would the university refuse to move
against someone using its email
accounts in a fashion that undermines
its educational purpose, violates its
own policies, and possibly constitutes
criminal behaviour?
In late August, Professor Shahid
Alam, at Northeastern University in
Boston, Massachusetts, wrote a piece in
Al-Ahram Weekly Online in which he made a case for the boycott of Israeli academia as one example of a non-violent alternative to the increasingly desperate violent resistance of the Palestinians. In the process he explained the conditions of
Israeli occupation that had resulted in the various forms of violent Palestinian struggle, including suicide bombings.
The piece was reconstructed and misrepresented in the Jerusalem
Post to make it appear that Professor
Alam “justified terror attacks against
Israelis.”
On September 4, the Boston
Herald, apparently not checking the accuracy of the Jerusalem Post
report, announced “Professor shocks
Northeastern with defense of suicide bombers”. Almost immediately Professor
Alam began receiving a large number of harassing emails. In addition, in an act of identity theft, emails misrepresenting his position were forged and sent out under his name.
Northeastern University’s response to the Boston Herald report was to
“distance” itself from Professor Alam. The professor’s remarks were his alone and the university did not “condone or officially recognise them”. The impression was left that Northeastern assumed the
Herald piece accurate.
Why should Northeastern University
react in such a timid fashion to an
incorrect report that threatened the
reputation of one of its own faculty
members?
Throughout July and August, numerous organisations and individuals who support the Palestinian cause, oppose war in the
Middle East, support human rights and are just generally critical of Israel, were harassed and interfered with.
Among the victims was Monica
Terazi, director of the New York office of the American Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC). She was harassed and her identity stolen by hackers, which resulted in, for a time,
Yahoo groups taken her account off line.
When she reported this assault to the FBI, she was told no law had been broken — no money had been stolen, no computers physically damaged, public safety had not been endangered.
The entire hacker operation, according to the FBI, was simply an exercise protected by the First
Amendment.
Why should the FBI take such a
dismissive position on activities that,
in many states of the Union, are now
recognised as a form of, to quote the
Pennsylvania statute, “harassment and
stalking by communication”?
Ultimately, it was not the law enforcement agencies or university administrators who investigated the hackers, who had harassed, abused, and misrepresented so many people over the summer months. It was private individuals such as Professor Bassam Shehadeh, of Iowa State University. He managed to track down some of the sources of abuse to sites in Israel and its West Bank colonies.
The Israelis had committed their acts of harassment by accessing an ISP called
Palnet.com on the West Bank. When the
Israeli army went about systematically destroying electronic communication facilities on the West Bank they spared
Palnet.com.
Harassment via electronic communications is continuing. It is being used to intimidate and emotionally punish
American and British academics, as well as many others, who are critical of Israel and its policies. Yet nothing of significance is being done about it by authorities capable of curbing such behaviour.
For all intents and purposes, the inaction of academic and law enforcement authorities has created legal space for what are ordinarily illegal acts
— harassment, incitement to harassment, identity theft, and malicious misrepresentation.
At least this seems to be so when these assaults are directed against those critical of positions favoured by influential and powerful interest groups.
One can ask the question: would the FBI or the administrators at the University of
Pennsylvania or Northeastern University have taken the positions they now do if such organised and extensive harassment and identity theft had been directed against American Zionists by supporters of the Palestinians?
The hands-off position taken by the FBI and university authorities sets a precedent for the future. While critics of
Israel are now the main targets of web-based harassment and misrepresentation, there is no reason why the circle of victims cannot become much larger. [Worshipping hatred]After all it is a “virtual world” now and it is impossible to keep such behaviour “local.”
It seems we have found a new technological way of assaulting each other on a worldwide basis.
It was
[Don
Jose] Ortega y Gasset
who once observed that “hatred is a feeling which leads to the extinction of values.”
The present campaign of intimidation is certainly hate-filled and it is likely that others who hate will learn of these techniques and use them. Those who can stop this behaviour now, but have chosen not to, ought to think again before the future of communications becomes “extinct of values.”
Lawrence Davidson is professor of history at West Chester University,
Pennsylvania
Caricature source: Los Angeles Times
Outrage of British Jews at UK media’s Israel coverage: secret pressure fails to work
Daily
Telegraph trying to get anti-Israeli professor sacked
Government warns Texas Business against Boycott of
Israel
UK
Scholars Debate Boycott of
Israel
Hadassah
Is Boycotting All Boycotts
Department of what goes around, comes around:
Israeli fury at anti-Israel boycott
British
Journals
Oust 2 Israeli Scholars From
Their Boards
Harvard
President Sees Rise in Anti-Semitism on
Campus
German press reports teacher jailed for expressing doubts in private letter to a Jewish historian: latter turned it over to state political police
A glitch in the
Matrix – CNN’s skewed reporting on the Middle East
The former New York Times editor writes on the alleged Jewish Bias of the newspaper
Jeff
Jacoby in Boston Globe: A wave of Jew bashing in Europe follows Ariel
Sharon’s “self-defense” invasion of
Palestine
MSNBC
publishes astonishing list of US journalists who back Israel without qualification href=”https://fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/RadDi180102.html#snitch”>Mr
Jan
29, 2002: Nottingham University cancels
David Irving’s address to Forum: 300
messages of support flood in to students who invited him |
Mr
Irving’s regret (Radical’s Diary) |
previously: Outraged opponents of free speech threatened violence | Nottingham students stood firm on invitation |
Outraged
Jewish Chronicle editorial |
Irving’s Radical’s Diary On Robin Beck: Appointment as head of ISC at University of
Pennsylvania