Bali and al-Qaeda: Seven grounds for belated skepticism

David Irving comments:

THE website correspondent who sent me these links adds these comments of his own:

Why in the world would al-Qaeda attack a predominantly
Australian tourist site, in the nation of Indonesia, when both the Australians and Indonesians have been reluctant to support the US “War on
Terrorism”?

Why would al-Qaeda attack a
French ship when France is opposed to what the US is doing?

Will the Germans will be the next victim of the al-Qaeda bogeyman: This story from May 2001 reveals that Donald Rumsfeld was pressuring Indonesia into playing a more active role in the “war on terror”. Indonesia resisted
Associated
Press: Rumsfeld wants to restore military ties with Indonesia, which says no to counter-terror troops

  • An Australian letter writer reveals
    that the US ambassador was pressuring
    Canberra into supporting the “war on
    terror” (Many of those killed at Bali
    were Australians)
    Letter
  • This story reveals that CIA knew of
    a pending terror attack in Bali.

  • post:=”” warned=”” washington=””>This story reveals that the C-4
    explosive that was used is manufactured
    in USA and very hard to acquire:

  • This story reveals that a massive
    quantity of C-4 was used:     BBC News expresses doubts that Al
    Qaeda

    was behind Bali bomb

    on this website:

    Radical’s
    Diary: Mr Irving’s immediate doubts
    about on the Bali bombers