Real History and the Cost of the Iraq War The Index to the Traditional Enemies of Free Speech Alphabetical index (text) Eric Mueller comments: READERS of this website know this already but here are two stories from respected western sources (which I found quoted in Tuesday’s al-Quds al-Arabi ) that cast serious doubt on the official US stories on Iraq.
The Guardian shows how the US is fudging combat deaths — something our site has been pointing out for a long time. The Financial Times , meanwhile, quotes an independent survey on how Iraqis understand the resistance struggle. One should of course also regard these reports critically. The Financial Times says that “virtually all public opinion research” shows that most Iraqis want the occupation army to remain in Iraq.
This sounds like the type of result one gets when surveying opinion in the company of armed American troops. The Guardian, meanwhile, legitimately casts doubt on how the US distinguishes various types of fatalities in Iraq, but does not fundamentally question the total figures as a whole. For my part, I’m not at all sure that I have much faith in those numbers either. Arabist Eric Mueller is this website’s expert on Middle Eastern affairs.
He is a featured speaker at this year’s Real History weekend at Cincinnati, August 29-September 3, 2003.
————————– The Guardian The unreported cost of war: at least 827 American wounded Julian Borger Washington US MILITARY casualties from the occupation of Iraq have been more than twice the number most Americans have been led to believe because of an extraordinarily high number of accidents, suicides and other non-combat deaths in the ranks that have gone largely unreported in the media.
Since May 1, when President George Bush declared the end of major combat operations, 52 American soldiers have been killed by hostile fire, according to Pentagon figures quoted in almost all the war coverage. But the total number of US deaths from all causes is much higher: 112. The other unreported cost of the war for the US is the number of American wounded, 827 since Operation Iraqi Freedom began. Unofficial figures are in the thousands.
About half have been injured since the president’s triumphant appearance on board the aircraft carrier USS Lincoln at the beginning of May. Many of the wounded have lost limbs. The figures are politically sensitive. The number of American combat deaths since the start of the war is 166 — 19 more than the death toll in the first Gulf war. The passing of that benchmark last month erased the perception, popular at the time Baghdad fell, that the US had scored an easy victory.
According to a Gallup poll, 63% of Americans still think Iraq was worth going to war over, but a quarter want the troops out now, and another third want a withdrawal if the casualty figures continue to mount.
In fact, the total death toll this time is 248 – including accidents and suicides — and as the number of non-combat deaths and serious injuries becomes more widely known, the erosion of public confidence is likely to continue, posing a threat to Mr Bush’s prospects of re-election, which at the beginning of May had seemed a foregone conclusion.
Military observers say it is unusual, even in a “low-intensity” guerrilla war such as the situation seen in Iraq, for non-combat deaths to outnumber combat casualties. The Pentagon does not tabulate the cause of those deaths, but according to an American website that has been tracking official reports, Iraq Coalition Casualty Count, 23 American soldiers have died in car or helicopter accidents since May 1, while 12 have been killed in accidents with weapons or explosives.
Three deaths have been categorised as “possible suicides”, three have died from illness, and three from drowning. The rest are unexplained. Wounded American soldiers continue to be flown