⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
Real History and Censorship by its Traditional Enemies The index to this Lipstadtscandal your Deborah Lipstadt index your Lipstadt Trial index [images and captions added by this website] Honest Report.com [*] March 16, 2005 Photo: Prof Deborah Lipstadt received an ecstatic welcome when she spoke in Feb 2005 at Brandeis University, and signed six million copies of her latest book (equally true).
* Internet records show that HONESTREPORTING.COM was created in Oct 2000 by John Wiggins [email [email protected] ], address 57 The Grove, London (UK), postcode not stated, 02 09555 4678 [not a fixed London phone number] C-SPAN’s Shaky Balance THE cable network insists on granting air time to a notorious Holocaust denier. Yesterday (3/15), leaders from more than 40 nations gathered in Jerusalem to dedicate a new, expanded Yad Vashem Holocaust museum.
Yet at the very time that this monument to Nazi evil was inaugurated, the American cable network C-SPAN planned to give a notorious Holocaust denier a broad audience to promote his ideology that the murder of six million Jews never occurred. This, in the name of ‘journalistic balance’.
Here’s what happened: Deborah Lipstadt , Holocaust scholar at Emory University (pictured), will deliver a talk at Harvard University this evening (March 16, 2005), promoting her new book, History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving . C-SPAN wished to broadcast Lipstadt’s talk on the network’s BookTV program, but informed Lipstadt that a recent speech of Irving’s (recorded by C-SPAN) would need to be broadcast as well.
C-SPAN producers explained their reasoning to Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen: ‘We want to balance [Lipstadt’s lecture] by covering him [Irving],’ said Amy Roach , a producer for C-SPAN’s Book TV. Her boss, Connie Doebele , put it another way. ‘You know how important fairness and balance is at C-SPANWe work very, very hard at this. We ask ourselves, ‘Is there an opposing view of this?’ C-SPAN, that is, sought out an ‘opposing view’ to Lipstadt’s confirmation of the Nazi Holocaust.
Lipstadt refused to be cast side-by-side with Irving, on the grounds that Holocaust denial does not merit public debate. Cohen asks the appropriate question: ‘For a book on the evils of slavery, would C-SPAN counter with someone who thinks it was a benign institution?’ In personal correspondence with HonestReporting, Lipstadt explained: I would have been delighted to appear on C-SPAN’s BookTV. It is an important venue and is watched by a book-reading audience.
However, there was no way I was going to be forced into debating a man who is the equivalent of a flat-earther. I spent six years in court fighting this man. [ Website comment: She took the Fifth, and refused to testify in the London trial ]. We defeated him completely. That C-SPAN should now give him an opportunity to resurrect arguments which the court found completely false is appalling. Appalling — six million times over.
HarperCollins, the publisher of Lipstadt’s book, has supported Lipstadt’s decision not to appear on C-SPAN, despite the fact that this loss of publicity means a loss of book sales. HonestReporting encourages subscribers to write to C-SPAN, questioning its policy that grants equal air time to mendacious and immoral claims. Comments to C-SPAN: [email protected] Index to the media scandal surrounding Prof Lipstadt’s attempt to silence C-Span and the history debate 2005
See Also
- David Irving vs. Penguin Books & Deborah Lipstadt (Document)
- the Lipstadt Trial (Document)
- Day 3: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript (Document)
- Day 2: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript (Document)
- Day 1: Irving v Lipstadt Trial Transcript (Document)