⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
Historical Documentation Notice

This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.

The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.

Poste

Outraged
officials of the Canadian
Jewish Congress have urged
Chrétien to expel
Telegdi from the Liberal
caucus and party over his
comments.Kitchener-Waterloo
recordKitchener (Berlin)

Telegdi stands firm under fire

Statements on
Oberlander case concern Prime Minister’s
Office

Philip Jalsevac, RECORD STAFF

Liberal MP Andrew
Telegdi
has now come under fire from
Prime Minister Jean Chrétien
over remarks that Canada’s rules on citizenship and deportation smack of a totalitarian Nazi or Stalinist regime.

“The statements as reported are extreme and offensive and I can tell you that the statements in no way reflect the opinion or have the support of this government or the prime minister,” Duncan Fulton, a spokesman for Chrétien, said yesterday.

Outraged officials of the Canadian
Jewish Congress
have urged
Chrétien to expel Telegdi from the
Liberal caucus and party over his comments.

Asked if Telegdi faces that possibility, Fulton would only say: “We obviously want to confirm the accuracy of the statements … we’re discussing the comments with Mr. Telegdi.”

Telegdi, the member for
Kitchener-Waterloo, remains defiant in the face of the criticism.

In a news release yesterday, he alluded to the potential for his ouster from caucus but also defended his stance.

“I will not be diverted or intimidated from fighting an unfair process of citizenship revocation that exists in
Canada today.”

He said his job as a parliamentarian is
“not to defend the status quo, but to fight for a just society.

“For me, my citizenship comes before my party.”

The MP, who said “my stepfather fled
Romania because he was Jewish,” also took another poke at the Jewish congress and said: “It is highly offensive to be lectured about citizenship . . . by the
CJC.”

The ongoing controversy stems from an interview last week in which Telegdi criticized the rules by which politicians, and not the courts, make the final decision on citizenship.

“That’s what Hitler used to do,” he said.

Telegdi said it would be “fundamentally unjust” for Ottawa to strip the citizenship of his constituent, Helmut
Oberlander of Waterloo, in light of the fact that he has no right to appeal a court decision against him.

Justice Andrew MacKay of the Federal
Court of Canada ruled last year there was no evidence Oberlander committed war crimes. But the judge found he failed to disclose to immigration officials his record in the Second World War as an interpreter with a Nazi death squad that killed 90,000 civilians.

Based on that finding, Immigration
Minister Elinor Caplan last week gave
Oberlander 30 days to respond to her recommendation to cabinet — which will rule on Oberlander’s fate — that his citizenship be revoked as a first step to deportation.

If cabinet follows Caplan’s recommendation, there are still several more steps, including an appeal to the
Supreme Court, open to Oberlander.

In his news release, Telegdi said he deplores the “sensational headline” in
Saturday’s Record that said: “Canada like
Nazi regime, Telegdi says.”

“Of course, I do not wish to offend the
Jewish people, with many of whom I have discussed my position. Many have understood and supported my demand that due process be recognized.”

Referring to the headline, the MP said:
“Those are not my words, nor do they reflect my beliefs.”

However, he did not claim he was quoted inaccurately in the article.

“What I have said is that a liberal democratic state such as Canada should never remove citizenship lightly. That is what Hitler did to Jews, Gypsies and many others. That is what Stalin did to millions. All totalitarian regimes have engaged in these practices.”

The MP also cited former Superior Court
Justice Roger Salhany of Kitchener, who was retained by Oberlander to write an opinion on MacKay’s ruling. Salhany said
MacKay committed errors in law by allowing inadmissible evidence, making erroneous findings of fact, drawing unreasonable inferences and failing to apply the correct onus of proof.

“The evidence relied upon by the judge would never be relied upon in a Canadian court of law to establish that something happened,” Salhany wrote. “It would be considered as no evidence at all.”

Referring to the judges’ dissent,
Telegdi said: “Unlike the CJC, which wants
Oberlander deported summarily, I have not rushed to judgment. I have stated that I am not competent — nor is the federal cabinet — to arbitrate between differing judicial opinions.”

In its own news release, the congress’s outgoing president Moshe Ronen is quoted as calling Telegdi’s comparison of
Canadian law to a Hitler-style regime as
“an insult to all victims of Nazi barbarism.”

Cambridge Liberal MP Janko Peric, meanwhile, said if Telegdi is expelled from caucus “that would be a sad, sad day for all new Canadians, including myself.”
He would be penalized only “for fighting for justice. And justice must prevail.”

Peric, who emigrated from Croatia in
1968, supports Telegdi’s position on citizenship revocation.


Letters
[[email protected]
]

Telegdi is right | Walter Halchuk | May
8, 2001

Good for Kitchener-Waterloo MP Andrew
Telegdi. Ottawa’s denaturalization and deportation regulations do harken back to
Soviet and Nazi times. Telegdi is standing up for what is right and not merely for what is currently legal or expedient.

Clyde Gilmour’s comments in his May 7
letter, Canada Is Nothing Like A Nazi
Regime, suggest that Canadian laws such as those that excluded Jews from Canada during and before the Second World War, or those that resulted in a Chinese head tax or the internment of Japanese and
Ukrainian Canadians should have not been opposed and changed.

This approach to denaturalization and deportation is wrong, just as capital punishment was wrong and Telegdi has every right and a duty to say so.

Walter Halchuk

Sudbury

http://www.therecord.com/opinion/letters/opinion_letters_01050892638.html


Don’t deport Oberlander | Helene
B.Schramek | May 8, 2001

I must respond to the decision by
Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan to seek the deportation of Waterloo resident
Helmut Oberlander.

In February 2000, Federal Court Justice
Andrew MacKay ruled there was no evidence
Oberlander was involved in mass executions but that based on a “balance of probabilities” Oberlander had lied about his wartime activities to enter Canada.
There was no evidence confirming this —
only Justice MacKay’s opinion.

Beginning in the late 1940s, approximately 150,000 immigrants a year were slated for Canada, there was a backlog of 10,000 awaiting processing and there were only 11 RCMP visa control officers in Germany to screen applicants.

There was more concern about allowing communists into the country than letting in Nazis and many people have come forward to attest they also were not questioned about wartime activities.

A Canadian Jewish Congress member claims that comments by Paul Tuerr of the
German-Canadian Congress regarding
Caplan’s decision could strain relations between ethnic groups in Canada and are destructive to the multicultural harmony of the country.

Multicultural harmony and positive ethnic relations can only exist in fair and equal situations — not just in the interest of one group. Kitchener has already felt this multicultural harmony diminish, as I am sure the rest of the country will, if Oberlander is deported.

Look around you, at your 17-year-old sons, daughters, nieces or nephews. What would they do if someone ordered them to serve at gunpoint? Would they be strong enough to refuse?

Let us hope this will never happen again and that in 50 years’ time, they will not have to answer for their actions at a young and vulnerable age.

Helene B.Schramek

Kitchener

http://www.therecord.com/opinion/letters/opinion_letters_0105089286.html
.

Source Information
Original Publication: 2001-05-09
Digital Archive: Focal Point Publications
Accessed: June 3, 2026