Jpost190201

Real History on where the Holocaust Money is Being Spent The The Anti-Defamation League continues to use its new found wealth in a manner helpful to American society Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith, USA other traditional enemies of Free Speech: Anti-Nazi League Australian Government Australian B’nai Brith Anti-Defamation Commission Board of Deputies of British Jews Center for Democratic Renewal, Atlanta Canadian Jewish Congress Canadian League of Human Rights of the

B’nai Brith Coalition for Human Dignity, Oregon Community Security Trust of Board of Deputies German Government Jewish Telegraph Agency Searchlight and Gerald Gable Simon Wiesenthal Center Surfwatch Internet censorship Finally, and importantly, many present and former high-ranking Israeli officials of both major political parties, and leaders of Jewish communities in America and Europe, urged the pardon of Mr.

Rich. — Outgoing US president Bill (“That’s another fine mess you’ve got me into”) Clinton explainsFebruary 19, 2001 [Picture added by this werbsite] US Jewry slams Clinton for blaming Rich pardon on Jews By Elli Wohlgelernter [right: click FBI mugshot of Clinton benefactor Marc Rich for rapsheet] JERUSALEM (February 19) – American Jewish leaders vigorously condemned former US president Bill Clinton for shifting the blame for his pardon of financier Marc Rich onto Jews and Israelis.

In an opinion column in The New York Times, Clinton listed eight reasons for pardoning Rich, the first seven dealing only with the legal and technical merits of the case. No. 8 read: “Finally, and importantly, many present and former high-ranking Israeli officials of both major political parties, and leaders of Jewish communities in America and Europe, urged the pardon of Mr.

Rich.” “I think he should not use the Jews as scapegoats,” said Ronald Lauder , chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, whose members arrived here yesterday for their annual leadership mission. “This was done for reasons that should be just based on the merits of the case; and by bringing Israel into this, it’s unfair to Israel.”

A senior official in the Prime Minister’s Office, however, said Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s inner circle does not feel that Clinton is trying blame Israel or the Jews for the Rich pardon. “He spelled out eight reasons for the pardon, and the last one had to do with Israel,” the official said. “So what?” But Malcolm Hoenlein , executive vice chairman of the conference, said Clinton’s comments were “very unfortunate and inappropriate.”

Hoenlein said that while one can raise the issue over the appropriateness of Israeli intervention, “clearly the president’s motivations listed in the first seven reasons – which were based on legal considerations and other considerations – were really dominant.” “I think it would be very unfortunate for the onus to be placed on Israel and Israeli officials, in a matter that is purely an American domestic legal issue.”

Harvey Blitz , president of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, said it was “inappropriate for the president to hide behind the Jewish community in trying to justify this action that he took. It was his job to evaluate the context in which these pardons were granted, and in the context of a fugitive from justice, whatever the foreign policy considerations were. It was for him to judge, and not to later comment that he was doing it in support of the Jews.”

A couple of organizational leaders pointed out that while Clinton blames Jewish pressure for the Rich pardon, it was not a factor in the issue of pardoning Jonathan Pollard .

“It is deplorable that Bill Clinton would state that that was the principle reason for his pardoning Marc Rich, when of course he had the same pressures from the same community in both Israel and America demanding Pollard’s release, and that meant nothing to him,” said Mort Klein , national president of the Zionist Organization of America.

Seymour Reich , a former chairman of the Presidents Conference, said, “If he wanted to please the Jewish community and the State of Israel, he could just as easily have pardoned Pollard, and he would have found that he would have had support from a broad segment of the community.” (Herb Keinon contributed to this report.)

This article can also be read at http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/02/19/News/News.21643.html Related stories: Jewish Leaders’ Unpardonable Role Toronto Sun: Money talks and criminals walk FBI wanted poster on Marc Rich: reward offered 2001 David Irving