⚠️ Historical Documentation Notice
This document is part of a historical archive and is presented for scholarly research and educational purposes.
The content reflects historical perspectives and should be understood within its historical context.
Real History and the foes of Free Speech some traditional enemies of Free Speech: Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith, USA Australian Government Australian B’nai Brith Anti-Defamation Commission Board of Deputies of British Jews Center for Democratic Renewal, Atlanta Canadian Jewish Congress Canadian League of Human Rights of the B’nai Brith Coalition for Human Dignity, Oregon Community Security Trust of Board of Deputies German Government
Jewish Telegraph Agency Searchlight and Gerald Gable Simon Wiesenthal Center Surfwatch Internet censorship Alphabetical index (text) London, [Shorter version; click for unedited Internet version ] Irving to debate with libel QC at Oxford Union Will Woodward Education editor THE Oxford Union [of Oxford University] came under fire last night for inviting David Irving , the HoIocaust denier, to address students in a debate with the barrister who faced him across the high
court, Mr Irving will contest the motion that “this house would restrict the free speech of extremists” at the university debating chamber
on May10. Richard Rampton QC (right) successfully defended the academic Deborah Lipstadt last year after her book had accused Mr Irving of being a Holocaust denier. The judge, Mr Justice Gray , agreed and ruled Mr Irving was “an anti-Semite and a racist a right-wing pro-Nazi polemicist’ who represented himself in the libel trial, is due for a further court encounter with Mr Rampton when he seeks leave to appeal [
on June 20] against the verdict. An invitation from the union last year for Mr Irving to speak was cancelled after protests . The union said that this time it intended to fulfil the invitation and had contacted Thames Valley police. Claire Dissington , of the Anti-Nazi League, said her organisation would try to prevent the debate and would put pressure on other speakers.
Michael Whinge , spokesman for the Board of Deputies of British Jews , said: “I am really surprised that Richard Rampton is giving him any credence whatsoever by appearing on the platform with him.” Mr. Rampton said: “I have no problem appearing in a debate of that kind against him. As a professional advocate, and for the purpose of this debate, I have no feelings about him at all. I think these arguments are best won largely speaking by open debate.”
Mr Irving said: “I don’t think Rampton will be able to persuade the students of Oxford that opposing free speech will be a good thing.” In a statement, Amy Harland , president of the union, said: “Whatever the outcome of this debate, if Britain is to be a free and diverse nation, this is an issue that needs to be addressed.”
Related items on this website: Action Report on the invitation [with links to press clippings about previous such invitations] The above news item is reproduced without editing other than typographical Register your name and address to go on the Mailing List to receive 2001