[Images added by this website] Toronto Wednesday, April 2, 2008 Criminal complaint filed by Marc Lemire (left) against Canadian Human Rights Commission for theft of WiFi signals in order to spy on Canadians and post racist messages on websites http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/CHRC_criminal_complaint.html APRIL 2, 2008: Over the past few weeks it has been revealed that employees of the Canadian Human Rights Commission have been using fake pseudonyms to sign up accounts on website they have targeted as" hate" sites. According to explosive allegations filed by Marc Lemire with the Ottawa Police Service and the RCMP, not only were the CHRC spying and posting misinformation on targeted websites -- but they connected to the unsecured wireless access point of an unsuspecting neighbour and impersonated her internet connection to do so. After 10 months of litigation due to absurd claims of 'national security' by a panic stricken CHRC, and a blizzard of legal motions, Marc Lemire won the right for a subpoena of the records of Bell Canada to reveal the subscriber information of 'Jadewarr' -- an account used on the White NationalistStormfront.org website by CHRC employees. The 'Jadewarr' character had tried to entrap Marc Lemire and others. A few months ago it was revealed at the Federal Court of Canada that the 'Jadewarr' account was used by numerous CHRC employees, but primarily by a Senior Investigator named Dean Steacy. Alain Monfette, director of the law enforcement support team for Bell Canada, was called by Marc Lemire pursuant to a subpoena to bring the subscriber information of the person using the "Jadewarr" account on Stormfront. Mr. Monfette testified on March 25, 2008 that the Bell Canada subscriber using IP address 70.48.181.203 on Dec 8, 2006 (connected for the entire day) was: Nelly Hechme, of Laurier Avenue in Ottawa. It is now becoming crystal clear why the Human Rights Commission had so strenuously fought the issuance of the subpoena after their last minute capitulation before we went to Federal Court, January 15 to challenge their invoking Sec. 37 of the Canada Evidence Act. Once having claimed the information would endanger either 'national security' or the safety of a person, the Commission threw up its hands and admitted the 'jadewarr' pseudonym trolling Stormfront (and, it would turn out, on many other conservative and nationalist forums) was none other than their blind lead 'hate' investigator Dean Steacy. So, if the subpoenaed Bell Canada information would reveal that the IP address of 'Jadewarr' was a Canadian Human Rights Commission address, why fight the subpoena? Now we knew. 'Jadewarr'' address was not at the CHRC. The plot now thickened and the depths of Commission skulduggery and subterfuge got even skankier. During later testimony Dean Steacy claimed he to had no knowledge of who Nelly Hechme was or how that person got access to the 'Jadewarr' account on Stormfront. Later that evening, the National Post's Joe Brean called Nelly Hechme and asked what she knew about this. The poor Nelly was shocked. I am sure it's a pretty odd day when the National Post calls and asks if you're a government agent posting racist messages on the Stormfront website, especially when you have no idea what Stormfront even is. ON March 26, 2008, The National Post in a front page story reported: 'Reached by phone last night, Ms. Hechme, 26, told the National Post she has no connection to the tribunal, has never known any of the investigators, and has never accessed a Web site as Jadewarr. She said that in the relevant period in 2006 she did have a Bell Sympatico account with a wireless connection that was not password controlled, meaning anyone within range of her apartment could have accessed the internet with it.' WiFi Stealing: Nelly Hechme lives on Laurier Ave West in Ottawa, Ontario. The Canadian Human Rights Commission is at 344 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario. About 1 block away, across an open field. A distance easily travelled by a WiFi signal. A wireless scan done outside the CHRC's office shows numerous unsecured wireless access points in range. How many others have been similarly targeted by the out of control Human Rights Commission? Pseudonyms used by the CHRC on the Internet "Jadewarr" "Jade Warrior" "OldensRevenge" "OdensRevenge" "[email protected]" "[email protected]" "[email protected]"   Who is 'Jadewarr' Well, the simple answer, extracted like a rotten tooth with a twisted root from the Canadian Human Rights Commission and their lead 'hate' investigator Dean Steacy, is that that was the name he used to write to people on Stormfront, VNN, FreeDominion and BCWhitePride to try to winkle out information, like people's addresses. As 'Jadewarr', he was no longer an investigator, but an impostor and a spy. For more information contact Marc Lemire: [email protected] http://www.freedomsite.org CRIMINAL COMPLAINT NAME AND ADDRESS OF RESPONDENTS: Canadian Human Rights Commission 344 Slater Street, 8th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1E1, Canada Telephone: (613)995-1151 Fax: (613) 996-9661   Dean Steacy Investigator, Canadian Human Rights Commission John Chamberlin Manager, Investigations Canadian Human Rights Commission   Sandy Kozak Investigator, Canadian Human Rights Commission RELEVANT CRIMINAL CODE PROVISIONS: Mischief in relation to data 430. (1.1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use of data; or (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use of data or denies access to data to any person who is entitled to access thereto. Unauthorized use of computer 342.1 (1) Every one who, fraudulently and without colour of right, (a) obtains, directly or indirectly, any computer service, (b) by means of an electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, intercepts or causes to be intercepted, directly or indirectly, any function of a computer system, Theft of telecommunication service 326. (1) Every one commits theft who fraudulently, maliciously, or without colour of right, (b) uses any telecommunication facility or obtains any telecommunication service. Interception of Communications 184. (1) Every one who, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, wilfully intercepts a private communication is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years. ALLEGATION: On December 8, 2006 at 3:29 pm (EST) Dean Steacy and/or John Chamberlin and/or Sandy Kozak, used the pseudonym "Jadewarr" to access the Stormfront.Org website. In order to hide their identity, the respondents wilfully and with malicious intent connected to the wireless access point of Nelly Heckme, without her knowledge and/or approval, in violation of Canadian law. PARTICULARS: On December 8, 2006 at 3:29 pm, (EST), Dean Steacy, an investigator at the Canadian Human Rights Commission logged onto the Stormfront.Org website using the pseudonym "Jadewarr" to print off a post entitled "Italy for Italians" This print out was entered into evidence by the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC),during a hearing before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (Tribunal), File No. T1106/8705, on December 12, 2006. (Beaumont case) The material submitted by the CHRC showed that the pseudonym logged into Stormfront was "Jadewarr" Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit A is the transcripts of December 12, 2006 Tribunal hearing. On March 25, 2007, I accessed the Stormfront.Org member public profile for user "Jadewarr". The user profile shows that the last activity (last logon) was 12-08-2006 03:29 PM. As well it showed a join date of 02-02-2005 and the E-mail address [email protected]. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit B is the Stormfront member public profile for "Jadewarr". In March , 2007, I requested and received the IP address and e-mail address associated with the Stormfront member "Jadewarr" from Don Black, the owner and operator of Stormfront.Org. He provided me with the following information: IP Address: 70.48.181.203 Host Name: bas2-ottawa23-1177597387.dsl.bell.ca E-Mail address used: [email protected] Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit C is the affidavit of Marc Lemire, dated 12 February 2008. On May 10, 2007, at the hearing of Warman v. Lemire, [Photo at right shows Richard Warman] before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, the CHRC invoked Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act to block all questioning on the "Jadewarr" account. Dean Steacy was the witness on the stand. On May 14, 2007, Marc Lemire filed a motion before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal for a subpoena of BellCanada's records for: User account and subscriber information for the user of IP Protocol address: 70.48.181.203, with hostnamebas2-ottawa23-1177597387.dsl.bell.ca, that was connected to the Bell Sympatico and/or Bell Canada network on: December 8th, 2006 at 03:29 PM(EST) On May 15, 2007, The Canadian Human Rights Commission replied: The Commission, pursuant to section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.C-5, formally objects to the disclosure of this information. We certify to the Tribunal that this information should not be disclosed on the basis of the public interest as the disclosure of this information would be prejudicial to the Commission's investigative process On May 17, 2007, the Tribunal ruled that Section 37 has been invoked by the CHRC for the Bell Canada Subpoena, and that only the Federal Court of Canada can review the application. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit D is the ruling by the Tribunal. On May 17, 2007, Marc Lemire filed a Notice of application with regard to Judicial Review of all Section 37 invocations, before the Federal Court of Canada. On December 20, 2007, Margot Blight, counsel for the Canadian Human Rights Commission gave in on all Section 37 objections and made voluntary admissions on the identity of Jadewarr. The information revealed by the CHRC, in admissions certified as true by counsel, in regards to Dean Steacy was: 2. Getting back to Jadewarr, do Commission employees sign up accounts on Stormfront, under pseudonyms such as "Jadewarr"? A.: I used the Jadewarr email address to create an account on Stormfront. I am not aware whether or not other investigators have created other accounts on Stormfront. 3. Do you know who Jadewarr is? A.: Jadewarr is not a person, it is an email address and a user account on Stormfront.org. I created the Jadewarr email address on yahoo.ca and the Jadewarr account on Stormfront. I have used the Jadewarr email address and the Jadewarr account on Stormfront on occasion, in the course of investigating complaints. I am not aware of anyone else having used the Jadewarr email address or account. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit E is the admissions by the CHRC dated December 20, 2007. On January 15, 2008 before the Federal Court of Canada, CHRC counsel Margot Blight withdrew their Section 37 objection to the subpoena of Bell Canada. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit F is the ruling by the Federal Court of Canada. On March 3, 2008 the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal allowed the issuance of a subpoena of Bell Canada's records for the "Jadewarr" records. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit G is the ruling by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. On March 25, 2008, Alain Monfette, director of the law enforcement support team for Bell Canada, testified under oath before the Tribunal (Warman v. Lemire) that the owner of the IP address 70.48.181.203 on December 8, 2006 at 3:29 PM was:   Nelly Hechme 570 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, Ontario User ID: b1cgsw59 Connection date and time: December 7, 2006 from 18:37:22 to December 8,2006 at 21:35:56 Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit H is the subscriber information as provided by Bell Canada. On March 25, 2008, Dean Steacy testified under oath before the Tribunal (Warman v. Lemire) that he used the "Jadewarr" account and printed the webpage as used in the Beaumont case. Dean Steacy also testified that: John Chamberlin, Sandy Kozak and his assistant also had the password to the "Jadewarr" account. Mr. Steacy also testified that he does not know who Nelly Hechme is. On March 26, 2008, the National Post newspaper in a front page story entitled "Jeers and Loathing at tribunal" reported the following: Reached by phone last night, Ms. Hechme, 26, told the National Post she has no connection to the tribunal, has never known any of the investigators, and has never accessed a Web site as Jadewarr. She said that in the relevant period in 2006 she did have a Bell Sympatico account with a wireless connection that was not password controlled, meaning anyone within range of her apartment could have accessed the Internet with it. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit I is the March 26,2008 National Post article. On March 26, 2008, Marc Lemire attended the address of Nelly Hechme at 570 Laurier Ave W. Upon arriving, it was clear that the Canadian Human Rights Commissions office was merely 1 block from her apartment. A mapquest review of the location shows that between the CHRC's office at 344 Slater Street, 8th Floor and Nelly Hechme's apartment at 570 Laurier Ave W, is separated by a large open field. Attached to this my complaint and marked Exhibit J is a satellite view of the area. It takes a purposeful intent to connect to a wireless access point. The person would have to scan for wireless access points. And then select the one you wanted to connect to. It was no accident they connected to Nelly Hechme's access point, in order to impersonate her internet IP address and conceal what they were doing on internet websites. The Canadian Human Rights Commission employees have taken numerous steps in the past to hide their real internet IP address, by using Internet anonymous redirecting services such as"the-cloak.com". In an attempt to cover up their actions, the CHRC has attempted to block the issuance of a subpoena of Bell Canada's records on at least three occasions. Initial motion filed for Bell Canada Subpoena (Motion filed: May 14, 2007, Section 37 of CEA invoked by CHRC on May 17, 2007) Federal Court of Canada (CHRC initially made submissions on why it should not be released. And then at the hearing date on Jan 15, 2008, the CHRC revoked their Section 37 of the CEA objection) Tribunal on issuance (CHRC against tried to block the Tribunal from issuing a subpoena. Tribunal issues subpoena on March 3, 2008) The dominant motive of the CHRC was to hide what their employees did and thus conceal from the public the questionable actions on their employees. A wireless signal from a wireless access point can easily travel a city block. COMPLAINT: Dean Steacy and/or other Commission employees wilfully connected to the wireless access point owned by Nelly Hechme, in order to hide their online identity. Then impersonating Mrs. Hechme, via her internet connection, browsed toStormfront.Org website and printed documents that were submitted as evidence of material fact before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. By wilfully and with malicious intent connecting to Nelly Hechme's wireless access point and then using her internet connection without authorization, they have committed Mischief in relation to data in contravention of Section 430 (1.1) (c)(d)of the Criminal Code. By wilfully and with malicious intent connecting to Nelly Hechme's wireless access point and then using her internet connection without authorization, they have committed Unauthorized use of a computer in contravention of Section 342.1 (1) (a)(b) of the Criminal Code. By wilfully and with malicious intent connecting to Nelly Hechme's wireless access point and then using her internet connection without authorization, they have committed Theft of telecommunication service in contravention of Section 326 (1)(b)of the Criminal Code. By wilfully and with malicious intent connecting to Nelly Hechme's wireless access point and then using her internet connection without authorization, they have committed Interception of Communications in contravention of Section 184 (1)of the Criminal Code. By wilfully and with malicious intent connecting to Nelly Hechme's wireless access point and then using her internet connection without authorization, they have committed other Criminal Code violations which this Police Service may deem applicable. Respectfully submitted; Marc Lemire. Our dossier on the origins of anti-Semitism RichardWarman.com   Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada's phony-racism industry When the censors start churning out the hate speech themselves -- that makes them as much a farce as a menace

Register your name and address to go on the Mailing List to receive or to hear when and where he will next speak near you