January 19, 1999Obituary Hanna
F. Sulner, 81, Expert Drawn Into
Mindszenty Plot By ROBERT McG.
THOMAS Jr. Hanna F. Sulner, a handwriting
expert who
reluctantly
helped Hungarian Communists frame
Jozsef Cardinal Mindszenty on
treason charges in 1949, then promptly
fled to the West and exposed the sham,
died on Jan. 5 at her home in Manhattan.
She was 81 and since 1950 had worked
quietly in New York as one of the nation's
leading authorities on disputed
documents. Half a century later it seems
surprising how much trouble the
Soviet-dominated Hungarian Government took
to fabricate the case against Cardinal
Mindszenty. As an intractable opponent of
the Communist takeover of Hungary in 1948,
he was clearly an enemy of the new
one-party police state. But at a time when other high-level
foes were simply being shot or jailed
without fanfare, the Cardinal's position
as the primate of a largely Roman Catholic
country required special handling. That the political police turned to
Mrs. Sulner and her husband, Laszlo, was
anything but surprising. When it came to
determining whether a handwritten note, a
typed letter or a signature on a will or
contract was real or forged, Mrs. Sulner
had few peers. From the age of 16 she had studied at
the elbow of her father, Prof. Julius
Fischof, a pioneer in handwriting
analysis who settled in Budapest after
World War I and won a reputation as
Eastern Europe's foremost expert on
questionable documents. She also studied
criminology and obtained a special degree
qualifying her to teach document
examination at the University of Budapest
law school. Taking over
her father's work after his death in
1944, she quickly inherited his
reputation as a meticulous professional
as well as his positions as official
handwriting and documents expert to
Hungary's courts, police and
military. Mr. Sulner joined the office in 1946.
After their marriage in November 1947, the
couple were gradually drawn, unwittingly
at first,
into the Communist Government's elaborate
machinations to discredit Cardinal
Mindszenty and frame him on treason and
other charges. Based on articles the couple wrote for
The New York Herald Tribune in 1950
describing their role in the case, it is
clear that Mr. Sulner was far more
involved than his wife in forging
incriminating documents, some ostensibly
in the Cardinal's hand, others bearing his
supposed signature. But if Mrs. Sulner was
able to remain somewhat aloof, it had less
to do with her fastidious devotion to the
integrity of her craft than with her
husband's willingness to do the dirty
work. That
willingness stemmed, he made clear, from
the knowledge that the couple's only
choice was to cooperate or be
hanged. Another reason was that Mr Sulner had
become particularly adroit in using, or
rather misusing, a device his wife's
father had invented for comparing
handwritings. It allowed him to copy
letters and words from one document and
rearrange them into a new, incriminating
one. In his 1974 memoirs, Cardinal
Mindszenty attributed his conviction after
a three-day trial in February 1949 to
texts created with the device by Mr.
Sulner, and, more crudely, by police
technicians he taught to use it. As the Mindszenty trial was drawing to
a close, the Sulners escaped to Austria on
Feb. 6, 1949. Four days later they
surfaced in Vienna, denounced the trial as
a farce and displayed microfilm of the
forged documents they had worked on. The next year, Mr. Sulner died at 30 in
Paris. He was said to have suffered from
heart disease, but his wife remained
convinced he had been poisoned by
Communist agents. Bringing her infant son to New York,
Mrs. Sulner quickly resumed her career,
testifying at more than 1,000 cases
throughout the United States, rarely for
the losing side. Once, testifying against three rival
experts in a will contest, she convinced a
jury that an otherwise pristine signature
bad been forged because the dots over
three i's were misplaced. In a field whose experts must rely on
copies of original documents held as
evidence, Mrs. Sulner, who published
numerous articles and an authoritative
handbook, "Disputed Documents," in 1966,
became famous for insisting on having her
own expert assistants make the
high-quality, precisely lit photocopies
she required for her detailed analysis
under the microscope. She is survived by her son, Andrew, a
document expert in Manhattan, and a
grandson. |