January
25, 1999Editorial
Uninvited
Guest
AST
WEEK, House of Commons Speaker
Gilbert Parent banned Doug
Christie from the parliamentary
precincts.
The
Speaker's office defended the ban on
the grounds that Mr. Christie as a
lawyer represents a notorious Holocaust
denier, one Ernst Zundel, in a
lawsuit against the Commons stemming
from a ban imposed on Mr. Zundel
himself last June. Don Boudria,
the government house leader, said Mr.
Christie is simply Mr. Zundel's
"messenger," and that permitting him
access to the Press Gallery would be
tantamount to rolling out the red
carpet for him.
No
one is strongly inclined to do that;
Mr. Christie [right]
might
certainly choose a better class of
clients (he also defended James
Keegstra); and Parliament's
privileges doubtless include the power
to ban undesirables from its precincts.
But such privileges, when exercised,
invite examination. Are all
undesirables banned (always excepting
actual MPs)? Or only some? What
criteria are used?
Whatever
his faults, the irascible Mr. Christie
is neither a murderer nor terrorist,
indeed a veritable lightweight when
compared to two recently honoured
guests to the Commons, Fidel
Castro, the Cuban dictator, and
Gerry Adams, the president of Sinn
Fein. Mr. Castro is responsible for
torture, terrorism, censorship, mass
murder, and 40 years of dictatorship,
and Mr. Adams held leading positions in
the terrorist organization that is
responsible for about two-thirds of the
3,300 political murders in Northern
Ireland in the last 30 years. Yet they
were warmly welcomed by the
Commons.
THE
pragmatic excuse is sometimes made that
such guests have to be welcomed because
it is they who have the power to
negotiate ceasefires and peace
processes. Very well. Let them be
directed to obscure government offices
where mutually convenient treaties can
be hammered out without publicity. What
is objectionable is that they should be
treated as distinguished statesmen --
or even as the equal of democratically
elected politicians whose torturing
stops at the English language. The
standing ovation that MPs, led by Mr.
Parent, gave to Gerry Adams disgraced
them and must have been a bitter blow
to his victims and their
relatives.
Inviting
Zundel himself could scarcely have
disgraced Parliament more.