Pinochet's
crime was saving his country from
Communism by
Pat Buchanan
01
DEC 98 - Great Britain may be winning
rapturous applause in leftist
circles
for the house arrest of General
Augusto Pinochet, but that
applause is
coming at the price of England's
reputation for square dealing.
This snatch
and grab is unworthy of a great
nation.
The
83-year-old ex-president of Chile had
come to England for surgery
under a
diplomatic passport. He had been
visiting London for years, often
to discuss
weapons buys. But this time, the
British buckled to an
extradition
order
from a Spanish judge who wants Pinochet
sent to Madrid to be tried
for
genocide, torture and
murder.
As
the House of Lords has ruled that
Pinochet is not entitled to
immunity under
a British law that protects former
heads of state, Home Secretary
Jack
Straw will decide Pinochet's
fate.
Astonishingly,
Prime Minister Tony Blair has
declared his neutrality in
this
affair, which is ripping apart Chile
and shredding Britain's
175-year-old
friendship with that country. It is
time the leader of Great
Britain
acted like one.
General
Pinochet is the target of this judicial
kidnapping and proposed
show
trial not because his sins are worse
than other leaders' but because
this
man of the right inflicted a historic,
crushing defeat on Marxism.
Watching
his country slide into the grip of a
murderous pack of Leninists,
Pinochet
in 1973 ordered the military to save
it. They did, ruthlessly, and
Pinochet's
rule left Chile free, prosperous and
pro-American, a crime for
which
the left can never forgive
him.
And
when one realizes that Spain played
host to Fidel Castro within days
of that
judge demanding the extradition of
Pinochet, the stench of Iberian
hypocrisy
is overpowering. For, more than any
man, General Pinochet routed
Castroism
in Latin America and turned the
continent toward democracy and
free
markets.
What
crimes did he commit? It is said that
during the coup that overthrew
the
Marxist Salvador Allende, 3,200 people
died or "disappeared." But even
if
true, that does not constitute
genocide.
If
it did, let the world put out warrants
for China's rulers who supported
Mao's
Cultural Revolution, in which hundreds
of thousands died. And let us
not
overlook General Suharto, who presided
over genocide in East Timor.
According
to one Pentagon source, the postponed
U.S. strikes on Iraq could
have
taken 10,000 lives, three times as many
as died in Pinochet's coup.
Would
former President Bill Clinton be
subject to extradition to a
post-Saddam
Iraq? What would Blair do if Panama
asked a British judge to
extradite
a visiting George Bush to be tried for
the deaths of innocent
Panamanians
during the U.S. invasion?
Should
Russia's Mikhail Gorbachev, who
prosecuted the war of aggression
against
Afghanistan from 1985 to 1987, be
subject to extradition to Kabul
or
to Lithuania or Latvia, where Gorbachev
sent Spesnatz troops in 1991,
and
innocent lives were lost?
Many
pro-Western regimes have been
overthrown violently with the
losers murdered
by the winners: Czechoslovakia in 1948,
Cuba in 1959; Vietnam,
Cambodia
and Ethiopia in 1975; Iran in 1979. No
one has demanded any
extradition.
The
"dirty war" against Marxist guerrillas
in Argentina was a far more
savage
affair than Chile's. Should the
Argentine generals and admirals
involved
now be put on an international watch
list?
In
the wars against European imperialism
in Asia, Africa and the Middle
East,
many revolutionary leaders who emerged
belonged to organizations,
including
the African National Congress of
Nelson Mandela, that engaged
in terror.
Would Blair declare neutrality if
Yitzhak Shamir arrived in
London and
a judge demanded he be held to answer
for his Stern Gang's murder of
Lord
Moyne in Cairo in 1944 or of U.N.
negotiator Count Folke
Bernadotte in
1948?
Uganda's
Idi Amin, Haiti's ex-dictator
"Baby Doc" Duvalier and
Ethiopia's
Col.
Mengistu enjoy political asylum
today, and Yasir Arafat, whose
Fatah killed
U.S. diplomats, just had an airport
named for him in Gaza, where
Clinton
plans to visit this month.
What
is being asserted by Spain today is the
right of national judges to
effect
the arrest and trial of leaders of
nation-states. This is both a
power
grab and a long stride toward a global
criminal court that is to be
placed
above nations. As America is the
greatest nation-state, our
military and
our political leaders will pay the
price if British moral timidity
lets this
precedent stand.
Tony
Blair should stop looking the other
way, play the man and let
General Pinochet
go home, and Bill Clinton should back
him up.