Posted Thursday, October
1, 1998
| A
Scientific Paper on Those Other Great Holocausts
in History Reader
George
Popovic
sends us this important paper, "The Death
Toll of Communism," by Professor
Rudolph
Rummel,
the foremost expert on genocide and
democide, of the University of
Hawaii. "I
AM sending you this material because it
shows how deadly Communism has really
been, according to Professor Rummel.
Note
that on the Nazi "Holocaust" Rummel
writes: "Consider that even in spite of
the archival statistics and detailed
reports of survivors, the best experts
still disagree by over 40 percent on the
total number of Jews killed by the Nazis."
| Introduction: Everyone
is aware of how costly in lives and
material a war can be, and for good reason
many scholars, researchers, intellectuals,
and interested citizens therefore focus on
how war might be prevented. Few, however,
are aware of even a more deadly scourge,
that is genocide and mass murder.
The
recent events in Rwanda have for a moment
riveted attention on a genocide that
within a few months has cost at least
500,000 lives. But if history is any
guide, memory of this genocide will soon
disappear and attention will refocus on
the horrors of war. Yet
in this century, genocide and mass murder
have killed about 170,000,000
people,
or over four times all those killed from
battle in all this century's international
and domestic wars. Communism, that is the
communist nations, have been responsible
for most of this killing.
Itself,
this one ideology, has murdered about
three times those battle killed in
war. An
enemy far worse than war itself is
totalitarianism (which includes Nazi
Germany). And, as I point out, the
solution is the universalization of civil
and political rights, that is, liberal
democracy.--RUDOLPH
RUMMEL | How
Many Have Communists Murdered? R.
J. Rummel, Professor of Political
Science University of Hawaii, author of
Death By Government (New
Brunswick, NJ: Trans-action Publishers,
1994) WITH
THE passing
of communism into history as an
ideological alternative to democracy it is
time to do some accounting of its human
costs. Few
would deny any longer that
communism--Marxism-Leninism and its
variants--meant in practice bloody
terrorism, deadly purges, lethal gulags
and forced labor, fatal deportations,
man-made famines, extrajudicial executions
and show trials, and genocide. It is also
widely known that as a result millions of
innocent people have been murdered in cold
blood. Yet there has been virtually no
concentrated statistical work on what this
total might be. For
about eight years I have been sifting
through thousands of sources trying to
determine the extent of democide (genocide
and mass murder) in this century. As a
result of that effort I am able to give
some conservative figures on what is an
unrivaled communist hecatomb, and to
compare this with overall world
totals. First,
however, I should clarify the term
democide. It means for governments
what murder means for an individual under
municipal law. It is the premeditated
killing of a person in cold blood, or
causing the death of a person through
reckless and wanton disregard for their
life. Thus, a government incarcerating
people in a prison under such deadly
conditions that they die in a few years is
murder by the state--democide--as would
parents letting a child die from
malnutrition and exposure be murder. So
would government forced labor that kills a
person within months or a couple of years
be murder. So would government created
famines that then are ignored or knowingly
aggravated by government action be murder
of those who starve to death. And
obviously, extrajudicial executions, death
by torture, government massacres, and all
genocidal killing be murder. However,
judicial executions for crimes the
internationally would be considered
capital offenses, such as for murder or
treason (as long as it is clear that these
are not fabricated for the purpose of
executing the accused, as in communist
show trials), is not democide. Nor is
democide the killing of enemy soldiers in
combat or of armed rebels, nor of
noncombatants as a result of military
action against military
targets. With
this understanding of democide, the
following list contains all communist
governments that have committed any form
of democide and gives their estimated
total domestic and foreign democide and
its annual rate (the percent of a
government's domestic population murdered
per year). It also shows the total for
communist guerrillas (including
quasi-governments, as of the Mao soviets
in China prior to the communist victory in
1949) and the world total for all
governments and guerrillas (including such
quasi-governments as of the White Armies
during the Russian civil war in
1917-1922). Each
line in the list gives, in order, the
communist regime or group, years in
existence up through 1987, amount of
democide in thousands, and the
annual rate of democide in percent. The
world total democide of all regimes and
groups, whether communist or
not. | Afghanistan
1978-87 228 (.157)Albania
1944-87 100
(.118) Angola
1975-87 125
.302) Bulgaria
1944-87 222
(.062) Cambodia
1975-79 2,035
(8.161) Cambodia
1979-87 230
(.398) China
1949-87 35,236
(.120) Cuba
1959-87 73
(.028) Czech.
1948-68 65
(.024) Ethiopia
1974-87 725
(.162) Germany,
E. 1948-87 70
(.011) Grenada
1983 .106 (NA) | Hungary
1948-87 27 (.007)Korea,
North 1948-87 1,663
(.250) Laos
(PDR) 1975-87 56
(.124) Mongolia
1926-87 100
.187)
Mozambique 1975-87 198
(.123) Nicaragua
1979-87 5
(.020) Poland
1948-87 22
(.002) Rumania
1948-87 435
(.055) USSR
1917-87 61,911
(.422) Vietnam
1945-87 1,670
(.105) Yemen,
S. 1967-87
(1.002) Yugoslavia
1944-87 1,072
(.118) | SUBTOTAL
1900-87
106,267 (.477) GUERRILLAS
1900-87
4,019
(NA) TOTAL
1900-87
110,286 (.477)
WORLD
TOTAL 1900-87 169,199
(.235) |
| Of
course, even though systematically
determined and calculated, all these
figures and their graph are only rough
approximations. Even were we to have total
access to all communist archives we still
would not be able to calculate precisely
how many the communists murdered. Consider
that even in spite of the archival
statistics and detailed reports of
survivors, the best experts still disagree
by over 40 percent on the total number of
Jews killed by the Nazis. We cannot expect
near this accuracy for the victims of
communism. We can, however, get a probable
order of magnitude and a relative
approximation of these deaths within a
most likely range. And that is what the
figures in list are meant to be. Their
apparent precision is only due to the
total for most communist governments being
the summation of dozens of subtotals (as
of forced labor deaths each year) and
calculations (as in extrapolating
scholarly estimates of executions or
massacres). With
this understood, the Soviet Union appears
the greatest megamurderer of all,
apparently killing near
61,000,000
people. Stalin himself is responsible for
almost 43,000,000
of these. Most of the deaths, perhaps
around 39,000,000
are due to lethal forced labor in gulag
and transit thereto. Communist China up to
1987, but mainly from 1949 through the
cultural revolution, which alone may have
seen over 1,000,000
murdered, is the second worst
megamurderer. Then there are the lesser
megamurderers, such as North Korea and
Tito's Yugoslavia. Obviously
the population that is available to kill
will make a big difference in the total
democide, and thus the annual percentage
rate of democide is revealing. By far, the
most deadly of all communist countries
and, indeed, in this century by far, has
been Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. Pol
Pot and his crew likely killed some
2,000,000
Cambodians from April 1975 through
December 1978 out of a population of
around 7,000,000.
This is an annual rate of over 8 percent
of the population murdered, or odds of an
average Cambodian surviving Pol Pot's rule
of slightly over just over 2 to
1. | In
sum the communist probably have murdered
something like 110,000,000,
or near two-thirds of all those killed by
all governments, quasi-governments, and
guerrillas from 1900 to 1987. Of course,
the world total itself it shocking. It is
several times the 38,000,000
battle-dead that have been killed in all
this century's international and domestic
wars. Yet the probable number of murders
by the Soviet Union alone--one communist
country-- well surpasses this cost of war.
And those murders of communist China
almost equal it. I
should note that communist forced labor
was particularly deadly, killing about
53,000,000
people. It not only accounts for half the
deaths under communism, but is close to
the world total of almost
59,000,000,
which also includes colonial forced labor
deaths (as in German, Portuguese, and
Spanish colonies). Communists also
committed genocide, to be sure, killing
almost
12,000,000 people
because of their race, religion, or
ethnicity, is about a quarter of the world
total . Communists are much less disposed
to massacre then were many other
noncommunist governments (such as the
Japanese military during World War II, or
the Nationalist Chinese government from
1928 to 1949). Communists were much more
discriminating in their killing overall,
even to the extent that in the Soviet
Union, communist China, and Vietnam, at
least, they used a quota system. Top
officials would order local officials to
kill a certain number of "enemies of the
people," "rightists", or
"tyrants". How
can we understand all this killing by
communists? It is the marriage of an
absolutist ideology with absolute
power. Communists believed that they
knew the truth, absolutely. The
believed that they knew through Marxism
what would bring about the greatest
human welfare and happiness. And they
believed that power, the dictatorship
of the proletariat, must be used to
tear down the old feudal or capitalist
order and rebuild society and culture
to realize this utopia. Nothing must
stand in the way of its achievement.
Government--the Communist Party--was
thus above any law. All institutions,
cultural norms, traditions, and
sentiments were expendable. And the
people were as though lumber and
bricks, to be used in building the new
world. Constructing
this utopia was seen as though a war on
poverty, exploitation, imperialism, and
inequality. And for the greater good, as
in a real war, people are killed. And thus
this war for the communist utopia had its
necessary enemy casualties, the clergy,
bourgeoisie, capitalists, wreckers,
counterrevolutionaries, rightists,
tyrants, rich, landlords, and
noncombatants that unfortunately got
caught in the battle. In a war millions
may die, but the cause may be well
justified, as in the defeat of Hitler and
an utterly racist Nazism. And to many
communists, the cause of a communist
utopia was such as to justify all the
deaths. The irony of this is that
communism in practice, even after decades
of total control, did not improve the lot
of the average person, but usually made
their living conditions worse than before
the revolution. It is not by chance that
the greatest famines have occurred within
the Soviet Union (about
5,000,000
dead during 1921-23 and
7,000,000
during 1932-3) and communist China (about
27,000,000
dead from 1959-61). In total almost
55,000,000
people died in various communist famines
and associated diseases, a little over
10,000,000
of
them from democidal famine. This is as
though the total population of Turkey,
Iran, or Thailand had been completely
wiped out. And that something like
35,000,000
people fled communist countries as
refugees, as though the countries of
Argentina or Columbia had been totally
emptied of all their people, was an
unparalleled vote against the utopian
pretensions of
Marxism-Leninism. But
communists could not be wrong. After all,
their knowledge was scientific, based on
historical materialism, an understanding
of the dialectical process in nature and
human society, and a materialist (and thus
realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown
empirically where society has been and
why, and he and his interpreters proved
that it was destined for a communist end.
No one could prevent this, but only stand
in the way and delay it at the cost of
more human miser y. Those who disagreed
with this world view and even with some of
the proper interpretations of Marx and
Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt,
wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or
Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other
words, communism was like a fanatical
religion. It had its revealed text and
chief interpreters. It had its priests and
their ritualistic prose with all the
answers. It had a heaven, and the proper
behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to
faith. And it had its crusade against
nonbelievers. | What
made this secular religion so utterly
lethal was its seizure of all the state's
instruments of force and coercion and
their immediate use to destroy or control
all independent sources of power, such as
the church, the professions, private
businesses, schools, and, of course, the
family. The result is what we see in the
above list. But
communism does not stand alone in such
mass murder. We do have the example of
Nazi Germany, which may have itself
murdered some
20,000,000
Jews, Poles, Ukrainians, Russians,
Yugoslavs, Frenchmen, and other
nationalities. Then there is the
Nationalist government of China under
Chiang Kai-shek, which murdered near
10,000,000
Chinese from 1928 to 1949, and the
Japanese militarists who murdered almost
6,000,000
Chinese, Indonesians, Indochinese,
Koreans, Filipinos, and others during
World War II. And then we have the
1,000,000
or more Bengalis and Hindus killed in East
Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in 1971 by the
Pakistan military. Nor should we forget
the mass expulsion of ethnic Germans and
German citizens from Eastern Europe at the
end of World War II, particularly by the
Polish government as it seized the German
Eastern Territories, killing perhaps over
1,000,000
of them. Nor should we ignore the
1,000,000
plus deaths in Mexico from 1900 to 1920,
many of these poor Indians and peasants
being killed by forced labor on barbaric
haciendas. And one could go on and on to
detail various kinds of noncommunist
democide. But
what connects them all is this. As a
government's power is more unrestrained,
as its power reaches into all the corners
of culture and society, and as it is less
democratic, then the more likely it is to
kill its own citizens. There is more than
a correlation here. As totalitarian power
increases, democide multiplies until it
curves sharply upward when totalitarianism
is near absolute. As a governing elite has
the power to do whatever it wants, whether
to satisfy its most personal desires, to
pursue what it believes is right and true,
it may do so whatever the cost in lives.
In this case power is the necessary
condition for mass murder. Once an elite
have it, other causes and conditions can
operated to bring about the immediate
genocide, terrorism, massacres, or
whatever killing an elite feels is
warranted. Finally,
at the extreme of totalitarian power we
have the greatest extreme of democide.
Communist governments have almost without
exception wielded the most absolute power
and their greatest killing (such as during
Stalin's reign or the height of Mao's
power) has taken place when they have been
in their own history most totalitarian. As
most communist governments underwent
increasing liberalization and a loosening
of centralized power in the 1960s through
the 1980s, the pace of killing dropped off
sharply. Communism
has been the greatest social engineering
experiment we have ever seen. It failed
utterly and in doing so it killed over
100,000,000
men, women, and children in cold blood,
not to mention the near
30,000,000
of its subjects that died in its often
aggressive wars and the rebellions it
provoked. But there is a larger lesson to
be learned from this horrendous sacrifice
to one ideology. That is that no one can
be trusted with power. The more power the
center has to impose the beliefs of an
ideological or religious elite or impose
the whims of a dictator, the more likely
human lives are to be sacrificed. This is
but one reason, but perhaps the most
important one, for fostering liberal
democracy. | Professor
Rudolph Rummel has set up in the
University of Hawaii a web site [ URL:
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~rummel/
] on democide (genocide and mass
murder), democracy, and war.
This
includes data, sources, statistical
analyses, books, and articles. The
democide data covers major pre-20th
century episodes of democide, and all
democide for all nations
1900-1987. The
site also covers material on the
democratic peace--the fact that
democracies do not make war on each other
and minimize domestic violence, including
democide. Following
are the contents: - Web
Site Introduction
- Personal
- Murder
by Government--Democide
- 20th
Century Democide
- Statistical
Evidence For Understanding And
Explaining Democide
- Individual
Megamurderers and Mortacracies
- Lesser
Megamurderers
- The
Miracle That is Freedom
- Data
and Results on Dimensions of Nations
- Conflict
and Violence
- Conclusions
and Policy Recommendations
- Some
Links to Related Materia
R.J.
Rummel Professor Emeritus of Political
Science University of Hawaii 46-393 Holopu
Place Kaneohe, Hawaii 96744 Ph: (808)
235-8866 E-mail: [email protected] |
| Register
your name and address
to go on the Mailing List to receive [ Go
back to AR Online Index
|
Index to AR.#14 |
Go
to Main Action Report Index
] |
|