High
Court sends looted Old Master back to
Germany By
Will Bennett, Art
Sales Correspondent 300,000
pictures 'are still
missing' A
£700,000 PAINTING looted after the
Second World War was returned to the
German government by a High Court judge in
London yesterday in a test case with major
implications for the art
market. Mr
Justice Moses ruled that the
17th-century painting by the Dutch
mannerist artist Joachim Wtewael
belonged to Germany rather than to a
Panamanian company, Cobert Finance, which
bought it in 1989. Had the company won the
case, the way would have been cleared for
a huge quantity of missing war art to be
sold openly, much of it in London, capital
of the art market. The
ruling on Wtewael's The Holy Family with
Saints John and Elizabeth and Angels
revealed details of the nefarious trade in
art looted by all sides in the chaotic
period at the end of the war. Convicted
Russian art smugglers gave evidence in the
case. Mr
Justice Moses said that the painting was
eventually taken out of Moscow in 1987 by
Big Mamma, the nickname of Mariouena
Dikeni, wife of the Togo ambassador to
the Soviet Union. Mrs Dikeni had
previously smuggled works of art,
including icons, out of Moscow. She
was contacted by a man who wanted to get
the Wtewael to Berlin and, after a meeting
in an embassy car, she agreed to act as a
courier. She was to be paid £28,000
when she handed the painting over to a man
called Fürst in West Berlin. But when
she returned to Moscow she claimed that
she had left it with a relative in Berlin.
The painting then disappeared for a time
before resurfacing in London. The
judge accused Cobert of lying and said
that Douglas Montgomery, one of its
representatives, had been associated with
"the payment of what I regard as a bribe"
to a witness in the case. The
8in by 6in Old Master, painted on copper
in 1603, was bought by the Duke of
Saxe-Coburg in 1826.
|
By the time of Nazi Germany's collapse in
1945 it had been given by the duke's
family to the Ducal Foundation for Art and
Science in Gotha. It disappeared after the
city was occupied by the
Russians. Cobert
said that the picture was given to a
Soviet colonel called Kozlenkov,
whose son sold it in Moscow in 1985. After
passing through two other owners it was
bought by Cobert, which tried to sell it
in London. It was withdrawn from an
auction at Sotheby's in 1992 after doubts
were raised about its
provenance. The
German government contended that it had
been stolen by Russian soldiers and taken
to the former Soviet Union, where it
surfaced in 1986. Cobert
argued that, whatever the history of the
painting, the German government had left
it too late to claim it back under the 30
years limitation period set by its own
laws. But
the judge ruled: "The
law favours the true owner of property
which has been stolen, however long the
period which has elapsed since the
original theft."
He said that it would be against public
policy "to permit a party which admits it
has not acted in good faith to retain the
advantage of lapse of time." He could not
allow Cobert "to succeed when, on its own
admission, it knew or suspected that the
painting might be stolen". The
judge accused Cobert of having
"deliberately and unconscionably concealed
facts" and said that by 1991 Mr Montgomery
knew that the painting had been stolen. He
ruled that, in any case, the limitation
period ran only from 1987 when Mrs Dikeni
"misappropriated" the painting. The judge
said: "Whether my conclusions will result
in a greater opportunity for those who
enjoy Dutch mannerism or wish to cultivate
their antipathies, others will have to
decide." Dr
Michael Carl, a German lawyer
representing the Bonn government, said
after the hearing: "This is an important
test case and such an extraordinary story
that they should make a film of it. I am
delighted at the outcome." Pamela
Kiesselbach, solicitor for Cobert,
said: "We have to analyse the judgment
properly, but there is a possibility that
we may appeal. The company has no further
comment at the moment." The
painting, which has been stored at
Sotheby's while its future was being
decided and where the judge viewed it,
will now be put on public exhibition in
Germany. ©
The Daily Telegraph 1998. |