The International Campaign for Real History

Posted Saturday, May 1, 2004

[] Index to the Traditional Enemies of Free Speech
[] Alphabetical index (text)
AR-Online

Quick navigation

 


Saturday, May 1, 2004

Soldier's diary details wider abuse at prison Va. staff sergeant facing court-martial implicates other agencies in Army

By Scott Shane
Sun National Staff

THE Iraq journal of Staff Sgt. Ivan L. "Chip" Frederick II, penned in careful handwriting and mailed home as he feared becoming a scapegoat for egregious military misdeeds, paints a nightmarish picture of overworked, undertrained guards coping with hostile Iraqi prisoners and using tactics that flagrantly violated international rules for treatment of detainees.

If true, the 37-year-old reservist's statements are a devastating indictment of a U.S. military that toppled a brutal dictator only to be accused of torturing Iraqis in a prison, Abu Ghraib, notorious for similar and worse horrors during Saddam Hussein's rule.

Frederick wrote his 10 pages of dated, diary-style entries and sent them to four relatives as the Army prepared to charge him with assault and other crimes. His account presumably seeks to minimize his responsibility for the abuse.

But his journal is replete with dates, names and grisly details - from the cover-up of the death of a prisoner in custody to descriptions of detainees left naked in chilly isolation cells for days. And it accords with complaints lodged for months by the human rights group Amnesty International, which called yesterday for a "fully independent, impartial and public investigation" of prisoners' treatment throughout Iraq.

In its most chilling lines, Frederick's journal describes the death in November of an Iraqi described as an "OGA prisoner" - an abbreviation for "Other Government Agency," military jargon for the CIA and other nonmilitary agencies.

"They stressed him out so bad that the man passed away," Frederick writes. The corpse was packed in ice and later prepared to suggest falsely that the prisoner had died under medical care: "The next day the medics came in and put his body on a stretcher, placed a fake I.V. [intravenous drip] in his arm and took him away. This OGA [prisoner] was never processed and therefore never had a number."

Abuse urged, he writes

A disturbing repeated assertion in Frederick's journal is that the abuse was encouraged by U.S. interrogators from "MI," or military intelligence, and "CID," or the Army's Criminal Investigation Division. Both are under intense pressure to help stop attacks on U.S. troops.

But no intelligence or CID personnel are among the 17 people, including Frederick, whom the Army has charged or named as under investigation. So Frederick's journal suggests that culpability reaches far beyond those implicated to date.

Frederick writes that when he questioned guards' conduct - "leaving inmates in their cells with no clothes or in females' underpants, [and] handcuffing them to the door of their cell" - he was told not to worry.

"The answer I got was this is how Military Intelligence (MI) wants it done," he writes. "MI didn't want any of the inmates talking to each other. This is what happened when they were caught talking."

Later, describing how prisoners were stripped naked and deprived of light, ventilation, water and toilets, Frederick asserts: "MI has been present and witnessed such activity. MI has encouraged and told us great job [and] that they were now getting positive results and information."

Likewise, an agent from the Army's Criminal Investigation Command told a guard "to stress one prisoner out as much as possible [because] he wanted him to talk the next day," according to Frederick.

Chris Grey, a spokesman for the Criminal Investigation Command, said he could not comment because the investigation of prisoner abuse is not over. No spokesman for military intelligence could be reached, but an officer in one MI unit mentioned by Frederick said he had no knowledge of any abuse.

In civilian life, Chip Frederick is a $26,722-a-year senior correctional officer at Buckingham Correctional Center, a medium-security prison in rural central Virginia. His wife, Martha, works in the prison's training department.

The prison houses 985 inmates - roughly the same number now held at Abu Ghraib - including some convicted of murder. Larry Traylor, spokesman for the Virginia Department of Correction, said officers such as Frederick are trained at a state academy.

'A long bumpy road'

Frederick's uncle, Bill Lawson, described his nephew as a well-built man of 6- foot-2 who enjoys fishing and barbecuing. Stepfather of his wife's two teen-age daughters, Frederick worked at a Bausch & Lomb factory until it closed down and got the prison job about six years ago, Lawson said.

Reached by phone at Buckingham Correctional Center, Martha Frederick said, "We realize it's going to be a long, bumpy road." Of her husband, she added, "He's doing OK."

Frederick's journal portrays himself and his fellow military police officers as struggling, with little guidance or support, to cope with prisoners who could be extremely challenging. He writes that the guards were "working a 12 to 14 hour shift ten straight days before getting a day off" and facing inmates emboldened by their belief that they "would not be treated as under Saddam."

Frederick contrasts the absence of clear rules at Abu Ghraib with the precise instructions he has at the Virginia prison, where guards have approved sanctions to use to control prisoners' behavior.

The only independent inspections of Abu Ghraib and other detention facilities are carried out by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Spokesman Florian Westphal in Geneva said that by policy, Red Cross inspectors never publicize mistreatment they find to preserve access to detainees.

Instead, they complain to prison authorities. If nothing changes, "in some instances, we've gone right up to the head of state," Westphal said.

In his journal, Frederick mentions that before a January visit from the Red Cross, there was a flurry of activity to "process" prisoners, or formally document their identity and status.

Early reports

An Amnesty International spokesman said yesterday that as long ago as July, his group reported that prisoners released from Abu Ghraib were describing severe mistreatment.

One detainee, arrested "after slapping his son and nephew to stop them fighting," spent 44 days in Abu Ghraib without being able to change clothes, shave or cut his hair, Amnesty reported. "Detainees were not given blankets to lie on, water was limited and the toilet was an open trench in view of all," the report said.

"We warned that denying access to prisoners by lawyers and family members removes an important protection against ill treatment," said Amnesty spokesman Alistair Hodgett.

Amnesty's watchdog work has turned up similar abuses in other facilities, he said.

"Questions about the treatment of prisoners in Iraq obviously goes far above the level of the guards," Hodgett said.

Sun staff writers Gus G. Sentementes and Jeff Barker contributed to this article.

 

Report broadcast by CBS on 60 Minutes II
Arab press publishes the first horrific photos | and others of explicit nature
Iraqi Prisoner Images 'Disgust' Bush, Anger Arabs
Reader's Letter: Glennon W. Simmons disagrees with Mr Irving's remarks on US troops in Afghanistan | and gets an immediate reply from another reader

The above item is reproduced without editing other than typographical

 Register your name and address to go on the Mailing List to receive

David Irving's ACTION REPORT

or to hear when and where he will next speak near you

© Focal Point 2004 F Irving write to David Irving