David Irving
comments: DYING regime? We were
asked to believe, months ago, that the
regime was dead. Paul Wolfowitz is
not even twistermeister of words, he is a
verbal stumble-bum of Blairite
proportions.
Initially the
dying was being done by thousands of
Iraqis, under the long range missile and
bomber attacks of intrepid US
("coalition") aviators, cocooned in
pressure-cabin, leather-seated luxury,
discharging their warheads from a height
of forty thousand feet and at a range of
fifteen miles or more, or by their naval
comrades in submarines lurking distantly
beneath the waves; by all accounts the
dying now is being done by the US soldiers
on the ground, who are under growing
attack by fighters in the country they are
occupying.
Bush said the game was
over, but these criminal spoilsports are
continuing to kick the ball around. Didn't
they read the rules? Defend your
fatherland, your culture, your museums,
and your families against an invader, and
in Twister-speak you are a terrorist, a
criminal.
The Twister says the
attacks are being conducted by "a few
members" of the army of "a dying
regime."
A few members?
The media report that there are now twenty
attacks every day on US occupation forces.
Note the frequency with which the Twister
uses the guilty words "criminal" and
"terror, terrorist, terrorism" in his
brief statement.
A psychiatrist might
have an explanation for that.
I wonder if Wolfowitz,
Hoon, Rumsfeld and the rest of the
criminal gang ever suffer from stomach
cramps, as the worst of the Nazi murderers
did. 
David
Irving starts a new US tour this
Fall 2003. Locations include: Atlanta, New
Orleans, Houston, Arlington (TX), Oklahoma
City, Albuquerque, Tucson, Phoenix, Los
Angeles, San Francisco, Portland (Oregon),
Moscow (Idaho), Sacramento, Las Vegas,
Salt Lake City, Denver, Chicago,
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Louisville. The
theme is comparisons - Hitler, Churchill,
Iraq, war crimes law, and Iraq.
[register
interest]
|
Friday, October 24, 2003 page A19  Twister hits
Iraq; Iraq's rockets miss him AFTER
intrepid Iraqi resistance- fighters fired at least
six RPG rocket grenades into the Hotel el-Rashid
this morning [Sunday, October 26, 2003]
from a blue trailer in the hotel park at a range of
just over five hundred yards, a visibly shaken and
angry Deputy Secretary of Defence, Paul
"Twister" Wolfowitz, the brain behind the
US-led invasion of this oil-rich country, left his
twelfth floor room in a something of a hurry and
made this mumbled impromptu statement to the
newsreel cameras:  THIS
terrorist act will not deter us from completing our
mission, which is to help the Iraqi people to free
themself from the type of criminals who did this
and to protect the American people from this kind
of act of terrorism. The criminals who try to
destablise this country had ruled and tortured Iraq
for 35 years and we have ended that act of
repression. But a few have refused to accept the
reality that this means the end of the ... We will
be unrelenting in pursuing them. As the President
has said we are taking this fight to the enemy. We
are bringing in additional international support
and we have steadily growing numbers of
...
We are getting the job done
despite the desperate acts of a few members of a
dying regime of criminals.
"WE hope the firing will be more precise and
efficient (next time), so we get rid of this
microbe and people like him in Washington who are
spreading disorder in Arab lands, Iraq and
Palestine," Walid Jumblatt said in a
statement. [source] | If
only he had listened to his
Father | In
A World Transformed, by George H. W.
Bush and Brent Scowcroft
(publisher Alfred A. Knopf, New York,
1998, page 489). Bush the Elder is
quoted as stating:  TRYING
to eliminate Saddam, extending the
ground war into an occupation of Iraq,
would have violated our guideline about
not changing objectives in midstream,
engaging in "mission creep," and would
have incurred incalculable human and
political costs. Apprehending him was
probably impossible.... We would have
been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in
effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would
instantly have collapsed, the Arabs
deserting it in anger and other allies
pulling out as well. Under those
circumstances, there was no viable
"exit strategy" we could see, violating
another of our principles.... Going in
and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally
exceeding the United Nations' mandate,
would have destroyed the precedent of
international response to aggression
that we hoped to establish. Had we gone
the invasion route, the United States
could conceivably still be an occupying
power in a bitterly hostile land. It
would have been a dramatically
different - and perhaps barren -
outcome.
|
... on this
website
Tony Blair boots
rogue MP George Galloway out of his
party
The hunt
for weapons of mass destruction yields -
nothing-
Official Is
Prepared To Address Issue Of Iraqi
Deception
|
![[]](../../std/dings/list.gif){kind=small}
write to David
Irving