Australian
Associated Press Friday, July 4, 2003 Tribunal
adjourns decision on Holocaust
film A TRIBUNAL today
adjourned a decision on whether to allow
the screening of a film by Holocaust
revisionist David Irving after the
film festival director failed to
appear. Judge
Michael Higgins told the Victorian
Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)
that the director of the Melbourne
Underground Film Festival, Richard
Wolstencroft, had faxed a letter to
him requesting an adjournment so he could
prepare a defence. But Mr Wolstencroft failed to attend
the VCAT where Judge Higgins was due to
decide this morning whether he should
grant a request by the Jewish Community
Council of Victoria (JCCV) for an
injunction preventing the screening of The
Search for the Truth in History. Judge Higgins temporarily adjourned the
hearing and unsuccessfully attempted to
contact Mr Wolstencroft to ask him to make
an appearance. When he returned to the VCAT Judge
Higgins said he would adjourn until
Monday. "If he doesn't turn up at 10 am on
Monday, I'll deliver judgment," he
said. Outside the court, JCCV president
Michael Lipshutz said the film
festival management had shown little
regard for the tribunal. He accused Mr Wolstencroft of being
available to the media and not the
tribunal. "They are playing it to the media on a
freedom of speech issue, which it's not,"
he told reporters.
- AAP
Herald-SunBrisbane, July 4, 2003 Holocaust
film anger By Kate
Jones A JEWISH group has
launched a legal bid to block the
screening of a controversial film by
British historian David
Irving. The Jewish Community Council of
Victoria believes Irving's film will
incite racial hatred. Irving, known internationally for
his claim the
Holocaust did not happen, has been
banned three times from entering
Australia. Council president Michael
Lipshutz instigated legal proceedings
at the Victorian Civil and Administrative
Tribunal yesterday. He is seeking an injunction to stop the
Melbourne Underground Film Festival
screening Irving's The Search for Truth
in History and a live phone discussion
with the British historian next week. "We are
seeking to defend our rights," Mr
Lipshutz said. "This is not a
freedom-of-speech issue. "We don't have unlimited freedom of
speech in this country, we don't go around
saying death to the Aborigines, death to
the Catholics or death to anyone else
because it wouldn't be appropriate." Richard Dreyfus, QC, for Mr
Lipshutz, said the film and another film,
The Israel Palestine Conflict from a
Palestine Perspective, were offensive
to the Jewish community. "These films were designed to vilify
Jews by denying the Holocaust," he told
the tribunal. Festival director Richard
Wolstencroft said he did not agree
with Irving's beliefs, but said the public
had a right to view his film. "People should be able to have
different arguments about history," Mr
Wolstencroft said. "I'm not going to defend Irving because
I don't agree with him, but I believe he
should be able to express his point of
view." Irving's theories on the Holocaust have
sparked global fury and in 1992 he was
convicted in Germany for defaming the
memory of the dead. The tribunal is due to deliver its
decision today. -
Jews
want holocaust film banned from
festival
-
Australia's
Jews protest plans to screen a film
made by Irving
-
Feb 1993: "The
Search for Truth in History",
videotaped speech to Australians, after
Labour Government refused David Irving
permission for a third tour
-
Sam
Lipski reviews Irving video in The
Australian, May 21, 1993
-
May
30, 1993: Australian newspapers report:
"Israeli secret agents linked with
bugging" device found in Irving
Video Censorship Bureau
-
Jeremy
Jones, Oct 27, 1994: Film Scheduled,
Dropped by Adelaide Television
-
How
Jews tried to ban Irving speech video:
An inside glimpse
|