We
hold thorough public inquiries
into rail disasters, plane
crashes and even natural
disasters. Why then does the
administration remain
steadfast in its opposition to
an investigation into the
biggest terrorism attack in
history?
--Rep.
Cynthia McKinney |
http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/news/0402/13mckinney.html Atlanta, Georgia, Saturday, April 13,
2002McKinney draws fire
for Bush remarks Questions
raised about prior knowledge of
attacks By MELANIE EVERSLEY Atlanta
Journal-Constitution Staff Writer
Washington -- Rep.
Cynthia McKinney drew flak on
Friday for her suggestion that the Bush
administration may have had advance
warnings of the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks, but the congresswoman defended
her comment, saying the idea deserved
investigation. David Irving
comments: OUR thanks to Robert
Reis for drawing our
attention to this item, and to
the fact that not only has the
newspaper halted the poll
referred to (below), but the very
record that the poll ever existed
has been removed from the
Atlanta Journal
Constitution archive and
search engine.
"Your
turn Are
you satisfied the Bush
administration had no advance
warning of the Sept. 11
attacks?" Yes.
| 54% | 10,070
| I'm
not sure. Congress
should investigate.
| 2% | 340
| No.
I think officials knew
it was
coming. | 44%
| 8,300
| Total
Votes | 18,710
|
| Critics demanded everything from a
congressional probe to political ostracism
of the Democratic congresswoman from
DeKalb County.Sen. Zell Miller (D-Ga.), for
example, issued a bristling statement,
saying her comments were dangerous and
irresponsible. He sarcastically referred
to her behavior during President
Bush's congressional appearances.
McKinney, he wrote, "arrives early to get
a coveted aisle seat, then leans way over
as Bush walks down the aisle, hoping he
will give her a kiss for all to see on
national TV." McKinney issued a nearly two-page
statement expanding on her comments, to a
Berkeley, Calif., public radio host. "We hold thorough public inquiries into
rail disasters, plane crashes and even
natural disasters," she wrote. "Why then
does the administration remain steadfast
in its opposition to an investigation into
the biggest terrorism attack in
history?" McKinney said that news organizations
around the world had indicated the
administration received warnings about the
attacks. She said while she had no evidence that
the administration had profited from the
attacks, corporations close to the
administration have benefited from the
increased defense spending following Sept.
11. The White House, through spokesman
Ari Fleischer, dismissed the
comments. "All I can tell you is the
congresswoman must be running for the hall
of fame of the Grassy Knoll Society,"
Fleischer told reporters, referring to
people who have theorized that
President Kennedy's murder was a
government conspiracy. On Capitol Hill, the response was more
dramatic. Rep. Charlie Norwood
(R-Ga.) said all GOP members of the state
delegation should sever communication with
McKinney until she retracts her
statements. "She has a perfect right under the
Constitution to say anything she pleases,"
Norwood said. "But as of her last
statement, she will learn that the rest of
the Georgia delegation has the precise
same rights and obligations to their
constituents and the nation." The Southeastern Legal Foundation, a
conservative nonprofit group based in
Atlanta, called for the House Ethics
Committee to investigate McKinney. "I think this is so
upsetting and
so outrageous," said foundation president
Phil Kent. Striking a more moderate tone, Rep.
Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) said he
didn't agree with McKinney, but there
should be no recriminations for her
comments. "She has the right to make statements,"
the Savannah congressman said. "If we
start investigating every crazy statement
made by a member of Congress, we won't
have enough members left to serve on the
Ethics Committee." Political observers wondered whether
the congresswoman would suffer at the
polls this year. McKinney is being
challenged for the Democratic nomination
by Denise Majette, a former State
Court judge from Stone Mountain. Said Emory University political
scientist Merle Black, "It
reinforces the view among serious people
in her district that she's a very
ineffective representative if this is how
she chooses to spend her political
capital." Majette weighed in herself: "For
McKinney to believe privately what she
says is disturbing," she said. "To trumpet
it publicly without proof or substance is
highly irresponsible and damaging to our
country." -- AJC staff writer Ben Smith
contributed to this report. © 2002
The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution |