EditorialThought
Crimes
BRUSSELS is putting renewed pressure on
the prime minister to make Holocaust denial a
criminal offence, as part of a package of
proposals which would harmonise European law
on xenophobia and racism.
If this happened, the expression of an
aversion to individuals based on their "race,
colour, descent, religion or belief, national
or ethnic origin" could be punished with a
prison sentence; further, those accused of
the offence could be tried in any EU state
without any niceties in the way of
extradition procedures. If there is any
measure that illustrates the folly of
across-the-board harmonisation of European
laws, this is it.
Plainly, there are valid reasons why
German citizens are forbidden to question the
extent and horrific nature of the Holocaust,
since the state is perpetually vigilant
against any possible resurgence of
anti-Semitic groups; indeed, recently an
American was sentenced to four years in
prison in Germany (of which he served three)
for distributing Holocaust-denial material.
But those considerations simply do not apply
here. There are laws which prevent the
incitement of violence, against groups as
well as individuals, and there are laws
against discrimination based on race. That is
all we need.
Would it advance the liberalism of British
society one whit if David Irving, the
historian who challenged the extent of the
Holocaust, had been fined for his opinions,
as he was in Germany in 1991? Would English
benevolence towards the Welsh be any greater
if Anne Robinson were to be prosecuted
for saying that she finds the Welsh
"irritating"? Would it advance the position
of Muslims if it were illegal to criticise,
say, the polygamy of Mohammed?
There is no rationale for this law in the
present condition of Britain. It would
diminish the freedom of the individual
without advancing the well-being of any
single ethnic or religious group. Tolerance
is one respect in which Britain needs no
lessons from the European Union.