THERE are two stories from the
Saudi paper ash-Sharq
al-Awsat (published in London
as well as Jeddah) that identify Bin
Laden's guest in the tape, the
mysterious "Saudi Shaykh."Of particular interest is that their
sources link the dream or vision about
which this shaykh talks to a different
religious leader than the one whose
name appears in the tape subtitles.
Is that because the
translator-transcribers couldn't hear
the name properly? If so, what else
might they have heard wrong?
Also
the "source" quoted by ash-Sharq
al-Awsat says that al-Harbi,
the Shaykh visiting Bin Laden in the
tape, was not responsible for the
making of the video.
How the source would know that, I
have no idea, but it's odd that the
guest, the Shaykh, seems to be very
much in the center of attention on the
tape. One would think that Bin Laden's
people, if they made the tape, would be
interested in focusing on "their
leader" putting the microphone close to
him. Yet it is the guest whose voice is
the least obscure of the lot (which,
admittedly isn't saying much).
Finally, I've attached my
translation of an editorial from the
Iraqi Baath Party paper ath-Thawra
of Sunday, 16 Dec. 2001. It throws
doubt on the tape, not from internal
evidence but simply because of the
various claims the US has made about
having "irrefutable proof" of Bin
Laden's responsibility.