[images
added by this website]Before:
Satellite image of World Trade
Center towers THE
semi-official Russian news
service "Strana.ru" published on
September 14, 2001 an interview
with Andrei
Kosyakov,
described as a former aide to the
Chairman of the Subcommittee for
Monitoring Intelligence Service
Activities, under the Supreme
Soviet of Russia (while that
existed, 1991-1993). The
interview has a number of
interesting elements,
particularly in the second half,
which intersect Tatyana
Koryagina's earlier strong
warning (about the collapse of
the US dollar expected on August
19). We provide these excerpts in
translation courtesy of
AR-subscribers Misha & Hanya
Kravchenko. |
Russian
Intelligence Figure Analyzes Further
Threats to United States Q: WHAT shows that the attack in the
U.S. was planned over a long time? Kosyakov:
First of all, people with
professional flying skills were selected.
There were are least four such agents
[one for each plane], and they
most probably each had a back-up, because
of the high probability that the planned
pilot could be injured during the
hijacking. Secondly, all participants in
the operation were prepared for martyrdom,
and such people are not easy to find.
Finally, the departure of four aircraft
from four [sic] different points
occurred at intervals of minutes. That
means that the distances, times of flight,
and schedules were calculated beforehand,
and flights were chosen that could reach
the strike targets within the most
convenient interval of time. This is all
quite complicated to calculate,
considering that the airliners also had to
be seized. Q: . . . Some analysts say
that only a state could do this. Kosyakov:
The preparation time has to
have been months. And the organization
must be quite powerful. In our view, the
participation of some state, is
doubtful. . . Not a single
secret service would accept such
casualties. They train their members in a
different way. Now if Bush had been
killed, then one might suspect the secret
service of some country. But in this case
the target was the civilian
population. . . Q: And what follows from all
this? Kosyakov:
You see, in evaluating the
situation one fact stuck out. It is known
that there were telephone calls from the
airplanes. One of the passengers that
called was a professional journalist. But,
the media has not made any mention of a
description of the terrorists. None of the
passengers who called said, for example,
"we have been hijacked by Arab
terrorists." Not one of them described
what the terrorists looked like, their
accents, pronunciation; nothing caused the
callers to want to characterize them in
some way. . . Q: Couldn't the secret services
conceal this information? Kosyakov:
These were private phone calls,
which not even the FBI could keep secret.
The conclusion suggests itself that the
outward appearance of the hijackers in no
way distinguished them from the rest of
the passengers. Only then, would a person
fail to mention any features of the
hijackers. This suggests that the
hijackers looked Caucasian. There is also another fact, pointing to
this. The criminals left a big lead: a
rental car was found, left at the airport
out of which a plane was hijacked, filled
with the Koran, and flying manuals in
Arabic. But then look: Not a single
organization has claimed responsibility.
That means, the terrorists want to conceal
their identity. So, given such
professionalism, given such extreme care,
how could such an error be permitted? This
hardly fits with the minute detail of the
planning of the action. All this points to the conclusion that
the criminals wanted to leave a false
trail. The secret services will pay no
attention to ordinary Americans or
Europeans, but will look for Arabs. Q: But isn't the practice of
self-sacrifice typical of Muslim
culture? Kosyakov:
You are quite correct. But who
told you that the dead hijackers were not
Muslims?. . . Based on the
information we have, analysis might lead
us to the conclusion that the perpetrators
were American or European followers of
radical Islam. Meanwhile, the real
criminals are being saved for the next
actions. For it is quite clear that a
combination is being played that has
several moves. Q: You mean, you think there will be
new attacks? Kosyakov:
Unfortunately, I think we must
prepare ourselves for new acts of terror,
in a different form, but just as
effective. Our estimates indicate that
ships could be used to ram hydroelectric
infrastructure. Imagine a dam being hit by
a passenger ship, or a tanker with two or
three thousand tons of oil. It would
inundate a couple of cities with a
population of a million and a half, plus
burning oil on top. Or another
possibility: train lines under the Hudson
River, which could be exploded from above
or below. And water would rush into the
tunnels. Q: You say the attack will be in
America? Kosyakov:
Yes. First of all, the
terrorists want to demonstrate their
skill. Secondly, remember that besides the
airplanes, also an automobile was blown
up. So, what would have prevented the
terrorists from also simultaneously
blowing up a couple of automobiles in
Europe, if they are preparing to carry out
actions all over the world? No, the target
was America, and the civilian population
in particular. Q: But some analysts say that if
Bush had been in the White House on Sept.
11, then the one airplane would have
fallen onto his residence, rather than the
Pentagon. Kosyakov:
This is unlikely. In that case
the White House or Pentagon, rather than
the civilian population, would have been
the first targets to be hit. For, clearly,
after a first successful attack, the
probability of success of the later ones
decreases. As you know, the last of the
attacks failed. I mean the plane that
crashed near Pittsburgh.
They probably shot
it down; and, difficult as it is to
acknowledge, they were right to do so.
Thus, the target is the civilian
population. There is such a formula: In
democratic countries the population is
responsibility for the actions of their
government. This formula guides the
terrorists. Therefore,
the next attacks will follow the same
principle. It is obvious that they will
take place around Wednesday--Thursday of
next week. Why? I don't want to explain
the logic of the terrorists that would do
them too much honor. But I want to repeat: the fact that the
terrorists are not claiming
responsibility, indicates that they will
strike again and again. Until the second
stage is reached -- the stage of global
conflict. This is the goal of all these
actions. At that point they will reveal
their authorship, in order to obtain a
mobilization reserve. Q: How could the U.S. secret
services sleep through this? Kosyakov:
I'll give you two examples.
Half a year ago, Israeli intelligence
carried out an exercise with the use of
aerial objects for carrying out terrorist
acts. For certain, the Americans had some
information about these exercises. But it
did not even occur to them to apply this
experience for their own purposes. The
second example: already in March of 1991
Korzhakov [at that time,
Boris Yeltsin's chief of staff]
sat in our office, and we laid out to him
the development of a coup in September.
Everything occurred according to our
scenario, except it happened in August
instead. That is, when a supposition or a
scenario is put out beforehand, which
appears improbable, no one takes it
seriously. And that is why Vladimir Putin
says that the intelligence services of all
nations should work together. Q: What is the probability that
American intelligence will be able to find
the leader of this operation? Or, will
they just give the public some cover
story? Kosyakov:
The probability is high. There
are people, there are the apartments where
they were located, and so there is a
trail, of course. Through the
perpetrators, the organizer may be
found. Q: And who is it? Bin Laden? Kosyakov:
Hardly. Sure, some conversation
of his was intercepted, where someone
reported about hitting two targets. That
would indirectly support his involvement.
But he is not the ideologue. he is too
visible. Those who could organize all this
are too clever, to be so
visible. Related
items on this website:- David
Irving: A Radical's Diary
|