The Ernst
Nolte Row Boils on: Part III
June 21, 2000 Hitler Apologist
Wins German Honor, and a Storm Breaks
Out By ROGER COHEN BERLIN,
June 20 -- The award of one of
Germany's most prestigious literary prizes to a
historian who has
sought to
justify the Holocaust has
ignited a fierce dispute here at a time of
conservative and reactionary intellectual stirrings
in Europe. The historian, Ernst Nolte, has argued
that Hitler's anti-Semitism had a "rational core"
and that Nazism was in essence a riposte to
Bolshevism. He received the Konrad Adenauer Prize
for literature this month, causing an uproar that
has filled newspapers with invective and divided
one of the country's leading historical
institutes. The prize, whose past recipients include former
Chancellor Helmut Kohl, is given for works
that "contribute to a better future" by the
Munich-based Deutschland Foundation. The
organization is conservative and close to the right
wing of the Christian Democratic Party but had not
been considered reactionary or revisionist. Accepting the prize,
Mr. Nolte said, "We should leave behind the view
that the opposite of National Socialist goals is
always good and right." He added that because
Nazism was the "strongest of all counter forces"
to Bolshevism,
a
movement with wide Jewish
support, Hitler may have
had "rational" reasons for attacking the
Jews. The timing of the prize was particularly
delicate because this is a period of some
intellectual ferment in Europe. The success of the
Austrian rightist Jörg Haider in steering his
Freedom Party into government has emboldened the
right. In Germany and France, a conservative reaction
is evident against what the French call "the
angelic left," which is accused of imposing a
stifling political correctness on debate and of
backing a multicultural tide that will sweep away
the European nation state. In this context, Mr. Nolte has emerged as an
iconoclast with apparently growing conservative
appeal. A few days after receiving the prize, he
was widely applauded
at a conference in Paris where he again explored
his thesis about Hitler and the Jews. "The award of the prize to Nolte was a clear
political statement intended to promote the view
that there is no particular stigma to Nazism in the
light of what some Germans now call the 'Red
Holocaust' in the Soviet Union," said Charles
Maier, a Harvard historian. "It's exculpatory
in the German context. It's also really
scandalous." The unease and anger in Germany over the prize
has been accentuated by the fact that another
prominent historian, Horst Möller, the
director of the disinguished Institute for
Contemporary History, chose to make the speech
honoring Mr. Nolte. The institute was established after the war in
Munich with a clear educational mission directed
largely toward researching Nazism. In his speech, Mr.
Möller said he did not agree with all of
Mr. Nolte's views, but went on to praise a
"life's work of high rank" and to make a
vigorous attack on the "hate-filled and
defamatory" attempts to stop open debate in
Germany. The reaction was overwhelming. Newspapers have
been filled with letters from other historians at
the institute calling on Mr. Möller to resign.
In an open letter to Die Zeit, Heinrich A.
Winkler, a professor of history at Berlin's
Humboldt University, said, "Mr. Möller allowed
himself to become party to an intellectual
political offensive aimed at integrating rightist
and revisionist positions in the conservative
mainstream." Mr. Möller's secretary said he was
traveling and not available for comment. With Haiderism thriving in neighboring Austria,
the ground has become fertile in Germany for a
nationalist and right-wing intellectual awakening.
It is fed by weariness, even anger, at what is seen
as Germany's eternal victimization for the
Holocaust, and irritation at the multicultural
message from a Red-Green government. Mr. Nolte took up these themes in his speech. He
attacked those who argue for "an unstoppable
transition toward world civilization." He bitterly
denounced the "collective accusation" continuously
leveled at Germany since 1945. The historian, the author of books including
"Three Faces of Fascism" and "The European Civil
War," has been well known for his argument about
Hitler and Stalin since the 1980's. But never before has a center-right institution
like the Deutschland Foundation moved to embrace
him in such a formal way, intimating that at least
the right of the Christian Democratic Party may be
ready to countenance the view that the crimes of
the Nazis were not unique and have been unfairly
singled out. Mr. Haider has made a lot of headway in Austria
precisely by questioning the "intellectual tyranny"
of the left.
Related file: Outraged NY
Times Reader's Letter Jun 22, 2000 from "the
Holocausst survivor community" Website comment: Note that Cohen refers to
all the professors (e.g. Möller, Nolte) as
plain "Mr." The opposing Winkler is however
identified as a professor of history.Related files: -
"Katyn
Forest Massacre. Polish deaths at Soviet
hands"
-
Räuber
Hotzenplotz und Petrosilius Zwackelmann
-
Press-Spiegel I
-
Press-Spiegel
II
-
Related links: Institut
für Zeitgeschichte
|