AR-Online 

 Posted Tuesday, May 9, 2000


Quick navigation

Alphabetical index (text)

  Exclusive:

Sunday May 7, 2000


Suppressed Air Force Report on Kosovo Bombing Shows Little Damage Done to Milosevic's Forces, Contrary to Early NATO and Pentagon Claims

Serbs Faked Bridges, Artillery, Missile Launcher

NEW YORK, May 7 /PRNewswire/ -- A suppressed U.S. Air Force report obtained by Newsweek shows that the number of targets verifiably destroyed by high-altitude bombing in the Kosovo War was a tiny fraction of what top military officers publicly claimed.

The report shows there were 14 tanks destroyed, not 120; 18 armored personnel carriers, not 220; and 20 artillery pieces, not 450. And instead of the 744 "confirmed" strikes by NATO pilots during the war, the Air Force investigators, who spent weeks combing Kosovo, found evidence of just 58 strikes. The damage report has been buried by top military officers and Pentagon officials, who, in interviews with Newsweek over the last three weeks, were still glossing over or denying its significance. Gen. Wesley Clark, the top NATO commander during the war, tried - at least at first - to gain an accurate picture of the bombing, Newsweek reports in the current issue. At the end of June, Clark dispatched a team to do an on-the-ground survey in Kosovo. The 30 experts were known as the Munitions Effectiveness Assessment Team, or MEAT.

The bombing, they discovered, was highly accurate against fixed targets, like bunkers and bridges. "But we were spoofed a lot," said one team member. The Serbs protected one bridge from the high-flying NATO bombers by constructing, 300 yards upstream, a fake bridge made of polyethylene sheeting stretched over the river. NATO "destroyed" the phony bridge many times.

In addition, artillery pieces were faked out of long black logs stuck on old truck wheels. A two-thirds scale SA-9 antiaircraft missile launcher was fabricated from the metal-lined paper used to make European milk cartons. "It would have looked perfect from three miles up," said a MEAT analyst. The team found dozens of burnt-out cars, buses and trucks - but very few tanks, and no indications that hit tanks had been hauled away.

When Clark heard this news, he ordered the inspectors to walk the terrain, report National Security Correspondent John Barry and Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas in the May 15 issue (on newsstands Monday, May 8). They came back with 2,600 photographs and briefed the commanders. "What do you mean we didn't hit tanks?" said Gen. Walter Begert, the Air Force deputy commander in Europe. Clark said, "This can't be. I don't believe it."

The Air Force was ordered to prepare a new report and in a month, Brig. Gen. John Corley was able to turn around a survey that pleased Clark. It asserted that NATO had successfully struck 93 tanks, close to the 120 claimed by Gen. Shelton at the end of the war, and 153 armored personnel carriers, not far off the 220 touted by Shelton. But Corley's team did not do any actual field research. Rather, it looked for any support for pilots' claims. "The methodology is rock solid," said Corley, who strongly denied any attempt to obfuscate.

"Smoke and mirrors," is more like it, according to a senior officer at NATO headquarters who examined the data, Newsweek reports. NATO sources also say two of Clark's officers cautioned him not to accept Corley's numbers. The U.S. intelligence community, too, was doubtful. "Nobody is very keen to talk about this topic," a CIA official told Newsweek. Over-rating the Kosovo bombing could lead to fundamentally flawed strategies in future similar conflicts, Newsweek notes.

The above news item is reproduced without editing other than typographical
 Register your name and address to go on the Mailing List to receive

David Irving's ACTION REPORT

© Focal Point 2000 [F] e-mail: Irving write to David Irving